48 team world cup.

Discussion in 'The Premier League' started by commachio1, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. commachio1

    commachio1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    49,811
    Likes Received:
    10,477
    Agreed by dodgy FIFA.
     
    #1
  2. The Liebherr Legacy

    The Liebherr Legacy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    10,264
    Likes Received:
    4,100
    **** idea. It's essentially just an extra play off round isn't it?
     
    #2
  3. commachio1

    commachio1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    49,811
    Likes Received:
    10,477
    16 groups of 3 to start. Top 2 qualify.

    So aye it is.
     
    #3
  4. The Liebherr Legacy

    The Liebherr Legacy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    10,264
    Likes Received:
    4,100
    Oh at least that sounds better than the other idea they spoke about. Which had 16 top seeds then the other 32 played off in the host country for right to join the group stage which then progressed as normal. So 16 nations will would only have got one game <doh>

    This is slightly better I suppose... though how long are they expecting it to last now?

    Not keen, but it will make FIFA lots of money...
     
    #4
  5. luvgonzo

    luvgonzo Walking the Cow

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    46,260
    Likes Received:
    8,205
    It's long and boring enough as it is, if it means less qualifiers though then that might be a good thing.
     
    #5
  6. luvgonzo

    luvgonzo Walking the Cow

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    46,260
    Likes Received:
    8,205
    It's now going to be 80+ games.
     
    #6
  7. commachio1

    commachio1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    49,811
    Likes Received:
    10,477
    In 32 days. <yikes>
     
    #7
  8. luvgonzo

    luvgonzo Walking the Cow

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    46,260
    Likes Received:
    8,205
    No idea if it'll be longer but the minimum games under the new proposals was 80 games and the maximum 88.
     
    #8
  9. The Prime Minister

    The Prime Minister Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2016
    Messages:
    2,788
    Likes Received:
    1,325
    Scotchland will still not qualify <laugh>

    and Englishland will still not get to the Q finals
     
    #9
    Mackem-Tiz likes this.
  10. FosseFilberto

    FosseFilberto Lord Of Misrule
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    22,619
    Likes Received:
    6,868
    I think it's a great idea ... England finish third in a group containing Burkina Faso and Nepal and can come home before the expectations of the deluded reach seismic proportions again... we can then settle down and watch some real footie <ok> ...
     
    #10

  11. Mackem-Tiz

    Mackem-Tiz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    1,138
    Likes Received:
    298
    This!
     
    #11
  12. Zanjinho

    Zanjinho Boom!
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Messages:
    9,050
    Likes Received:
    3,946
    Apparantly, there was a proposal for an increase to forty teams on the table with sixteen in the knockout stages.

    I can only assume that would have been eight groups of five, top two qualify.

    Would have been better than groups of three with top two progressing which offers very little incentive to top teams to go for the win.

    Would have been better if only top team progress in groups of three
     
    #12
  13. Zanjinho

    Zanjinho Boom!
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2014
    Messages:
    9,050
    Likes Received:
    3,946
    But still only a maximum of seven games for finalists (and playoff teams)
     
    #13
    luvgonzo likes this.

Share This Page