something ive always believed in is haveing managers on rolling weekly contracts look how wewll lee carsly is doing over atr there place then an idiot like ramsey would last three weeks,somelike warnock could go on for 4 years as long as they earn good money. A nd get good results then everything is ok,but what ramsey did at nottinghamn forest at home whereby he met a side who hadnt won an away game for 16 matches SO THE IDIOT MADE THREE CHANGES TO THE FIRST TEAM DROPPING GRANT ETC WOULD HAVE MET INSTANT DISMISSAL now does anybody agree brentford have got it right or do you all think that we should install a manager on a three year contract and spend the next ten years stuck in the middle of this division AND OH YES WHILE YOU ARE AT IT LETS SACK LES FERDINAND,ER WE DONT NEED A DIRECTOR OF FOOTBALL knowbody else in england have one so why do we give les 100 000 a year hes not even prepared to help out with the coaching
Ridiculous nonsense,Carsley is only a temporary manager until they appoint someone full time.He's already stated he doesn't want the job full time,and doesn't expect to be in charge by the end of the month!
Ramsay has GONE, do you really need to keep calling him an idiot and going on about him? He wasn't the only person responsible for the crapola state that we find ourselves in. Just get over it ffs
Of course you are missing a key point, what if the manager does well and another club offers him a a good deal? He can go at the end of the week to the new club and leave you up the creek at the drop of a hat. This idea only works if you only have crap manager after crap manager.......when do we start?
Please learn to write if you want to be taken the slightest bit seriously. Coming on here spouting indecipherable nonsense isn't going to help get whatever point you're making across.
Ted once again you amaze me, what goes on in your head? Why do you write some lines in capitals and others as you should.
Answers on a pin head please..... In respect of the 2nd part it could be that Ted likes to SHOUT so he can get his point over.......or a least that's how it looks......
A bit harsh on the poster's input Gentlemen? Surely a man is allowed say his bit in peace, be he Shakespearean or be he not?
Maybe, but then if we all created a long, barely legible thread every time we had a thought, the board would be rather cluttered.
BIT HARSH LADS,Im trying to find someway of getting out of this division,we need new ideas when jim gregory took opver the club in 1964 he had the idea of buying and selling players to create revenue ,and even when gregory left us we still kept this trully brilliant idea for many years after then along came the bosman ruling,and all of a sudden us wimbledon and norwich city being three main users of this system all took terrible loses indeed it cost wimbledon very dear,because there attendances were so low that with out this buy and sell system they went bankrupt most of you above posters who have posted here are unable to look at the fact thaty brentford are being brilliantly run they made a major mistake getting rid of mark warburtan but recoverd by getting rid of idiot and bringing in lee carsley
oh im so sorry eggsy i thought you were a male i guess your dad was qpr and thats how you became a qprfan
