Just wondering if the details of the meeting you attended have been posted and I've missed them. I understand that all relevant parties needed to be informed before they were put in the public domain, but was wondering what the timescale would be. (Assuming I've not missed them.) Cheers, Cavey.
The minutes won't be released until the rest of the Fan Working Group have seen them and we're still waiting for a date to be set for the next meeting, so you haven't missed anything. The meeting was supposed to be about now, so I chased James Mooney up this morning, but I haven't heard anything back yet.
More importantly, when will we see John Walkington's fabled report? It has been just over a year since he promised it...
When were they promised? Last time I asked you that you ignored me. Presumably this'll be the same. As you know full well, the club asked for them not to be released and CTWD, as they were at the time, respectfully agreed.
They were promised before they went. There would be no NDA otherwise they wouldnt go uff ufff uff etc etc
And there was no NDA, and details of the meeting were reported back on here and other sites as early as the night of the meeting itself. The club asked for the full minutes not to be released, so they weren't. Who does that look bad on? Who do you think said stuff so outrageous it had to be kept from public view?
I'm sick of hearing about these minutes. They arent being published, because they would be damaging to the club. Is you're curiosity so strong,that you'd take that damage ? Why don't you ask Assem Allam what was said ?
You should ask that of Assem Allam, as he asked for them to be with-held. We were told they would be published and his reasons were considered to be substantial enough for a promise to be broken. Now put that lid back on.
Convenient time for one of your smug 'I win' posts. Have another go; why do you think the club didn't want them released? Amazing how you can spin it as CTWD secrecy when it was the other party that wanted it kept secret. Not surprising mind. If the can of worms was better off closed then Happy shouldn't have opened it. Or should he not be challenged either?
I'm pretty certain there was no discussion of minutes beforehand. What was discussed was that dazedandconfused guy (who now posts as ....) insisting they would be forced to sign an NDA which was denied, and as usual he was wrong.
Amazing how they go from trying to ridicule John to screechy defending of their own backtracking. Glad I kept that tin opener handy.