Saints Academy Thread

As Sims is still 19, it's strange he never made the u 19 team ( if elligable ) probably should be in the u21 anyway

 

Jaidi out!!

 

Sod out play him at CB

 

https://southamptonfc.com/news/2017-03-17/jake-vokins-signs-professional-contract

Production line continues.

 

He's 17 already? Feels like he only just debuted for the u21's as a 15 year old.

 

Excellent, but I'm beginning to doubt the production line's ability. Someone needs to change that position switch; it seems stuck on "Left Back"

 

It's cheaper to make a lot of one thing at a time.

 

Half time 0-0

 

Lost 0 - 1.

 

http://dailycannon.com/2017/03/update-tella-trials-southampton-two-championship-sides/

Tella had trials at 3 clubs, but according to this favours Saints if we want him.

 

As long as it isn't a Costa Fortune Tella!

 

Not sure we want these boys from the big city coming down 'ere with their fancy Lunnon ways....leading our boys astray with talk of fast women and alcohol.

 

Someone on the radio asked a couple of days ago [sorry, I really can't remember when or if it was BBC, talkSport, or another station, I wasn't in charge of the radio] why, if Southampton's Academy is so good, how come their under-age sides aren't at the top of every league.? As far as I know, nobody had an answer. Of course, nobody was really that interested in looking into it either. Most of these pundits and presenters pay lip service to what might be called 'research' and 'knowledge', preferring 'hearsay' as their main incoming newsfeed. Anyway, I have one reason, that is fairly well known amongst Saints followers. The Saints Academy process is to promote the best players from a younger age group, upto the next age group, when they show definite signs that they are capable of it. What it means is that the under-age group they leave behind becomes weaker for their promotion, and hence they often don't lead their respective leagues. But the individually promoted players become fast-tracked and learn much quicker, according to their potential. And that's where it really matters. Not that the under-age team wins the league, but that the players progress. Josh Sims is a perfect recent example.

Hopefully a pundit read that.

 

Yep I believe you've got it spot on. As for the pundits, I doubt whether they'll read nor understand anyway, as they'll all rather knobbish

 

Thanks.

It's a shame you don't consider they'll understand it because I spent a little bit of time trying to make it perfectly understandable. Even to pundits.

 

I don't even think results are that important at youth level tbh.

 

Gone are the days of the "Stiffs"! The reserve team was very much used to keep game time up for supporting players and those returning from injury, there seems to be a reluctance to do that these days. The U23's side is certainly used more to assess players coming up through the ranks. On many occasions this season young players have been playing "above" their designated level and although it doesn't get match results it does give youngsters plenty of opportunity to show what they are made of. What has happened to Two Bob, is his career on the rocks?

 

Also a lot of the academy lads are with the first team squad so don't always get the opportunity to play for the relevant age group