Supporters Committee Meeting

Attention has been drawn to exactly that point in the past. The powers ignored it.

 

Answer the question FFS. It is either 'yes' 'no' or 'not really sure'.

 

That's why I didn't suggest just drawing attention to it, but presenting it in a way that commits them to signing off on a hazard and showing how it could be in contravention of the guidance they use, and the risk of removing it, is lower than the risk of harm in keeping it.

 

Fair enough. Good luck with it.

 

My, that sounds familiar.

 

What do you mean by that?

 

That must be it. Bitterness because he was invited

 

Time well spent ...

 

Bloody hell, boxes ticked, comedy gold ...

 

It's clearly time to boycott these meetings. They're taking the piss, it's just embarrassing.

I'm not in the least bit surprised though.

 

Actually there shouldn't be a boycott...there should be a sit in until they agree to demands

 

Good plan. We'd need to stock up though

 

Let's all turn up to the next one and insist we were invited.

 

And we're not leaving until Ehab comes and spends an hour with us and a few small peni coladas

 

You're right but we all know the answer would be "We can't comment on the policies of other police forces..."

 

True. But of course if they want to impose any new restrictions they would justify it by saying that this is done by other forces, or the other justification,which is impossible to disprove, " Research has shown...".

 

Who is this Richard Campion? What a deluded mong. Does he post on here?