Oh dear, I suppose Corbyn will somehow get blamed for this one ..... https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/en...QE9HW_cEAFZzlwfvFfs372rmF057bBKd-aPpjhGofeomq
Anyone that is not Labour is extreme right wing according to the Huffpuff Post and the story (lies) loses any sort of credibility when they refer to the DFLA as far right. Having a picture taken in a pub with a couple of blokes proves nothing, when at football and someone is taking photos of the group you are with, do you know the views of everyone in the photo? A very bad hatchet job by a **** media outlet.
So which particular 'facts' are untrue? Seems to be a lot of 'facts' referenced, so is it all of them, just one, or a few? I suppose someone has paintshopped the photos too. Then again, the photos are clearly posed by someone with a straight down the middle political standpoint, aren't they? Not.
So if you had someone takes a photo with you in it, you catch a virus making you believe the same views lol. . Can't understand why you always argued with Glory, you obviously have the same views, remember you having a photo.
You've got a virus in the brain by the looks. She knew exactly who he was. Even as a newbie MP, she would have been briefed. And what a guy! If you took the trouble to actually go through the article, you would have caught the guy presenting his credentials in his photos. Burning the Quran, etc. I've posted them below for your convenience. please log in to view this image please log in to view this image please log in to view this image
I'm not an MP who has to maintain a straight down the line reputation. Only the most naive MPs would fall for this, & draw into question whether she's actually suitable to be an MP. Let's not forget that it was her that set up the celebration in the pub, so she must have known who was invited & had someone on the door to keep out trouble. I'm quite sure that if these guys were far left & not far right, they'd never have got in the pub. Or is she even more naive than she looks at this moment in time?
Perhaps you've never heard of pubs function rooms renting out function rooms for private parties. Everyone else has, so guessing you're going in to denial for the sake of it, or exponentially more thick that the most extreme estimates on here.
So before you pose for a photo you should check their social media accounts just in case they have posted some dodgy comments or photos in the past?
I've explained this above. If you throw a private party & you're in the public eye - particularly as an MP - you not only invite the people to the party - you vet them first. If not, you've got to accept all that is thrown at you. Do you really think these checks are not undertaken, especially after an MP was killed by a stranger? Their functions are much, much tighter than ever before. Go check if you don't believe me.
How much can you get wrong in one post, it was a public party, anyone could go and so no one was vetted.
Where did it say that? If it was, she's had a steep learning curve of what she should have done. Wonder who (ill-) advised her?