US Election

Are you seriously trying to deny that the MSM has been heavily biased against Trump?

 

"Go back to bed, America, there is nothing to see, here!" (the MSM)

 

I wouldn't agree, they just report what he says and does so people can decide themselves.

 

Not really, the square holds 13,000, so there's probably 25k-30k max, so less than Sunderland crowd.

 

There are a number of deeply suspicious events that took place, simultaneously, across the 5 swing States.

Firstly, there were the computer "glitches" that shifted votes away from Trump to Biden. Each of these States use the Dominion ballot machine.

Secondly, each of the five States all stopped counting votes overnight, and when counting resumed the next day, Trump's massive lead had turned to a loss. As one of the attorneys said, this was clearly planned, since it is highly unlikely that each of the five States would independently have decided to adopt this strategy. The assertion is that the pause in the counts was used to manufacture ballots. It is asserted that the Democrat vote-riggers didn't count on Trump being so far ahead in the count in these swing States, so needed to buy time to rig the vote in Biden's favour, not being able to rely on the Dominion machines, alone.

The lawyers say that the evidence is flooding in, and is "overwhelming."

 

I think they will put forward case after case after case, each one being even more "sensational" than the last, and each one being thrown out or withdrawn, all in an attempt to delay the votes being certified.

I'm basing that on what's happened with all the cases so far btw.

 

The evidence is ‘flooding in’....yet he claimed it was definitely rigged the minute he realised he was ****ed 11 days ago.

Nothing but a load of desperate bullshit.

 

The Democrats have created a complex fraud that has been four years in the making, and they have done absolutely everything in their power to cover up the evidence. It is not surprising that the evidence is taking time to uncover. Neither is it surprising that the early court cases were thrown out.

As new, and more damning evidence comes to light, Trump will hope for better results.

What is emerging, so far, is that there is evidence of voter fraud. Whether or not it is strong enough to stand up in a court of law will clearly be tested.

What I am struggling to understand is why people are so keen to deny the Republicans the right to have their evidence tested in court. For something this serious, surely the safest thing is for the evidence to be collected, processed, and then given a fair hearing?

 

So I've watched it. The level of effort and man-hours required to manipulate and pull off the data for just ONE machine seems incredible> To do it with 9000 as he quoted nationwide would imo be completely impractical.

What's most damning about that video is he spent most of it showing EVERY single administrator action is recorded. Every addition, every change, every thing. So kind of undermines the whole message.

 

it's not suspiscious at all if you bother to look at how the votes are collected and the voting tendencies district by district.

 

Trump and other Republicans were warning of Democrat election fraud many months ago.

Neither is this the first time that the Democrats have tried to rig the vote.

 

I've got no problem with that last part.

But if it's just a delay tactic or a desperate attempt to discount people's genuine votes, then Trump deserves the lambasting he gets.

 

Only it was Trump who was desperately trying to rig the election by voter suppression in key states, with his cabal of lying ****s.

Only it failed, badly.

 

That video merely shows how easy it is to rig a voting machine. It isn't specifically about the machines that were used by the Democrats to rig this election.

Trump's lawyer's claim that they have an affidavit from someone who worked for Dominion, who explains how the machine's software was used to view the results in real time, and the algorithms used to calculate the vote-switch required to put the ballot in Biden's favour. This explains the "glitches" that were recorded live on TV. The witness says that votes can be copy-and-pasted from one folder to another.

 

What if there is real actual evidence of vote rigging?

Do you not agree that it should be heard?

 

To make it a fair comparison of procedures can you quote how many Republican States ALSO stopped counting votes overnight, whether the results were projected or not. Maybe it is common procedure?