The absolutely mental thing is that they’ve only made the vote available to members, ie. people who are more than likely happy with the ****ty membership scheme. If they were genuinely wanting to increase attendances they would make the vote available to all City fans, yes all, and see pretty quickly that the majority want concessions back. Wouldn’t they?
That is exactly what is said It’s not an assumption The website says the seating plan will revert to the 2010/11 one. It’s actually very clear I think https://www.hullcitytigers.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Have-Your-Say-Document.pdf And the photo clearly shows North as Away only
It’s just the typical bent Allam vote, we’ll only let those who already accept the membership scheme vote and we’ll threaten to move them again if they vote for concessions. Another vote, same old ****e.
I think at the moment I’ll vote for option B for concessions, but if I don’t get offered my original seat in E2 then I would cancel anyway I think that’s what I think I think
It might be nice if they didn’t allocate us a seat at all and then let us all choose where to sit when we arrive?
Unless I get my old seat in E2 back then I demand the following system be implemented Everyone who has a membership must attend close season and sit in their seats, but stand if they will do during games, then anyone being moved from North must be allowed to wander around and choose who to sit next to. There should be a 5 minute ‘getting to know each other’ period and then if you don’t want to get your seat there (due to annoying conversation, political opinions...or smells etc) the evacuees can get up and move. This can only happen a maximum of 3 times Reasonable I think
I don't think a lot of people not voting last time was down to apathy , in a rigged vote sometimes the best option is to not participate
That assumes the away fans will be in the North. 12,000 plus 1,500 equals 13,500 plus segregation. How many championship clubs filled their allocation this season? Not many. There's nothing stopping him opening the North for Leeds United and Sheffield Wednesday and closing it for the other matches.
As I don't get a vote at all, as like several generations and many others, it's deemed I've not been affected despite decades of involvement, I'll just agree with anything.
I wasn't particularly referring to the last vote, just the general apathy which abounds due to our owners. I have been a City fan for 56 years but I have serious doubts I will ever get back into it. Have arranged to meet up with some old time acquaintances when/if the Allams go but it will take a lot to get the old feeling back.
Well according to the proposals if we want concessions back then away fans will get the north stand . Actually it's not really clear but they could sell tickets on a game by game basis to home fans but you certainly can't get a membership there.
I saw that, but I just think it's as likely to be a mistake as to be a conscious decision to move seats again. That'd be insane to do, especially without actually telling anyone explicitly.
It would be better if the KC had been better designed in the first place. Reading g can accommodate different numbers of away fans and have just one aisleway as segregation in each instance. We will always end up with more seats lost than that for less than full houses.