Membership scheme vote - Concessions to return...

It looks very clear on the information to me in the second paragraph "this woud result in the seating areas inside the stadium reverting back to the 2010/2011 seating plan."

please log in to view this image

 

Which of the words are making you think that?
It says areas, and then shows those areas on a plan
And all of the North is away fans

(Not taking the piss but have you read the document?)

 

Yep
Very clear to me too

 

If 'B' is voted through as the option the North Stand will become the away stand again. I think that is a good move.

 

They even crayoned in the picture.

 

I go on my own and have enjoyed paying at times only £9 for a game - I don't have a season ticket as am military. However, I have not enjoyed sitting in a half empty stadium so have voted for Option B, I will gladly pay the extra if it means the club I have supported for 30 years is able to rise again! UTT

 

I definitely think your wrong, based on the people I know that pay the membership scheme.

 

But the whole thing is about pricing and there's absolutely no discussion of seat moves, which would surely be a big separate issue.

 

I'm a member and I've just cast my vote for the 'B' option. We've asked for concessions and now they are on offer. Plus the atmosphere was 100% better when the East Stand was full. I think it's a no brainer.

 

There’s no discussion about seat moves...they’re just telling you that’s what will happen
For what it’s worth Phil Buckingham thinks the same
If they don’t move me then I would be in the away end...it’s very clearly shown

 

So on the family plan thing, it doesn’t state how many subsequent members can join at the reduced rate. Anybody on here rich enough to pitch for a season ticket, with a couple thousand subsequent tickets at the lowest rate?

 

It’s B for me too.

 

As always with the Allams you need to read and understand every word, north stand not available for home supporters. Doesn't say that but look at the coloured in picture.

 

It does say that
I’ve been saying that several times too

 

On this occasion I’d be very happy to be wrong Al.

 

I’m in W5 so have no idea what the future holds for me other than I got a revised direct debit form to complete last weekend.

 

Seems to me like at least and at last there is a desire from our owners to seek a compromise here and find their way out of a hole of their own creation. Compromise makes the world go round. There's a time to be magnanimous not bitter and vindictive if we want the club to start moving forward again. I'm not a member as live 200 miles away but sincerely hope most members also want a bigger crowd and will vote accordingly.

 

As usual I’m more cynical
Haven’t done the maths but I imagine A will at worst get them the same income, B will allow more income from away fans for some games as they can have all North
They’re only trying to compromise as long as the compromise doesn’t cost them anything, or ideally earns them more

Which is sensible, I’d just prefer they admitted it

B for me though regardless

 

I hope you are right.

 

I'm not saying you're wrong because I don't know, but my initial reaction to that diagram was that it was a clumsy mistake by them. I think it's fairly likely they've just pulled up the old image from 2011 and forgotten that the away end has actually changed since then. It's just such a crazy idea to lump in an infrastructural change to the ground layout with a vote about pricing. Even for the Allams it's bizarre.