You know, I've never had a Liverpool fan say that, and yet they won a treble long before City. Pffft modern day fans
Sure is. But you cannot be "the greatest team ever seen" with no ****in champions league trophy in my book.
What the dull **** doesn't get is the reference to the CL is that it's won in the same season as the league, not as a one off.
Did Villa win the league and CL in the same season? Which is why City's 'greatness' compared to others has been questioned? No, they didn't. Why did you bring it up then, it's not relevant? Which is pretty much the theme of your current postings, irrelevance.
The post I responded to merely said that you needed a CL to be considered the greatest ... go back check ... admit you are having a mare ... but no need to apologise
Best Prem team ever? There's a few stand out choices and they are one of them. Better than 2nd place this season? Yup. All that matters really.
We all know fine well that you responded to the suggestion that winning a champions league means you're a great side. What the post clearly meant to anyone with even half a brain is that adding a champions league to their back to back titles would cement them as a great side. Which was patently obvious.
No one would consider the Liverpool side that won the CL in 2005 as great, for instance. Or the Villa one you pointlessly refer to. Obviously.
Has ‘Pool done the domestic treble? United? Leeds? No, thought not. Would be great if City did it next season, to really hammer it home to you fcukers.