RTG

Describing anyone who won't support his agenda as "thick" is somewhat ironic when he hasn't hidden his RL identity or the podcast he's affiliated to while spewing his toxic garbage.

Not the sharpest tool in the box shall we say.

 

Are you talking about me? I have never done a podcast and never would.

 

Reetio

 

No seriously, I haven't. Who am I supposed to be? I can say right now I have never done a podcast, never spoken to anyone at any media outlet, didn't send that ridiculously libellous post that keeps being deleted (nor do I agree with some key points of it). I haven't posted about it on twitter or facebook either. Whoever you think I am, that's who I'm not.

Also, I never would do those things because who the hell wants to be the public face when people are so hostile to anything negative about our finances?

 

To be fair I don't think kittenmittons is doing owt wrong. He's raised something which he's admitted isn't illegal, he's tried to give sources, and although he's replied a lot it's often been because of people responding to him. If he has concerns I don't think there's much wrong with that, certainly doesn't warrant people jumping on him!

 

I don't believe a word of your response, indeed, you've just demonstrated your character by referring to me as a 'troll'.

Stupid is as stupid does and not the demonstration of intelligence you wish it to portray!

 

Why do you not believe it? I don't understand why you're so absolutely convinced that I'm another poster somewhere else. And yes, I was being trolled, I don't even know if you were one of them, but people giving me **** just for posting and then expecting me to be civil or ignore them... I mean like I said, what would your response be?

 

Yet the way you lashed out, without any evidence, speaks volumes about your mindset.

 

If you think that calling people trolls is 'lashing out' I don't know what to say. If you think I don't have the right to say anything back when people respond to every post with hostility and claims of me being in the pay of people, or a mag, or just plain not liking Donald, then I think you're wrong.

I don't know why you're pushing this attack on my character, that's what is galling here, is that whether we agree or not on the finances, I ultimately care more about SAFC than anything else. If we questioned the motives of our owners as much as we questioned each other's, we'd be in a better position imo.

 

Why not start your own finances based thread?
No accusations of thread derailing.
Those not at all interested wont look in.
Prob have to explain yourself less.
Less hassle all round.

 

That sounds fair tbh.

There are people interested and everyone's entitled to an opinion tbh.

 

Good idea - I'm not interested in his accusations so they'd be easier to ignore.

 

I thought about it yeah. I could do that sometime.

 

Kildaremackem returned now on RTG stating that there is not a takeover to go through.

 

Rtg gone down?

Prepare for incoming

 

Probs best for it to go offline the amount of people pissing themselves about the possible Parkinson announcement.

 

Either volume of traffic or Roger has pulled the plug as he'd previously warned he would do?

 

If he isn't Charlie he's definitely linked to the owners mind. Loved when he said Methven and Donald (I noticed he put Methven first) were trying to sell but "nobody wants it", despite multi billionaires setting up holding companies and coming over for a match. If they aren't interested now then it flies in the face of all the "we're in great condition" comments, because either we aren't, or Donald simply refuses to go. They can't have it both ways

 

Probably just an unrelated outage tbh. There won't have been a sudden surge in numbers accessing it, not as if a manager has actually been named or owt, and although people aren't happy there hasn't been any rise in the levels of abuse which would probably force him to take it off

 

Can the mods turn the bell end detector function on please