The Nitty Gritty of the BLM movement

Oh that's the definition of self-righteous now is it? Sounds like you need a dictionary mate. Fair enough, I retract that and speak only for myself if it helps you get some more abuse in.

I didn't know shameless was banned (what for?). Is this like when you told bumblebee to **** off and die, and then he mysteriously got banned for responding?

Just a bully, pal, we can all see it.

Oh and by 'we' I mean other human beings.

 

He loves misquoting people to back up his agenda doesn't he?

I didn't say people have given up on BLM, I said,

"Thankfully this thread is fading away as is the hysteria about Floyd and BLM. I just checked the RTG thread and that's fizzled out as well."

 

Of course it was disingenuous man. I’m simply making the point that there are people on both sides that are happy to claim racial bias where it doesn’t exist.

 

You just can't stop can you ....

.... even people who don't post are now agreeing Smug is a bully, dear oh dear.

 

I didn't quote you. I paraphrased you. Do you not think people have given up on it then? You think they're still into it? You should probably do more posts about that than using words that suggest the complete opposite.

 

If you think there aren't an awful lot of people across here and RTG who believe you're a bully and a narcissist, then... good luck to you. The only reason they don't speak out on here is because they see what happens to people who question you.

 

You changed what I said man ...

... you're absolutely desperate to prove people wrong, be the better man and accuse people on here of being racists.

You just don't have the courage to name them.

 

The most pathetically desperate post I've seen in 20 years on these forums ...

... you're tragic.


I'll leave it there, you're now the self elected spokesman for 606, RTG and BLM, what next

 

Wonder how many of these players who are kneeling have even heard of Colin Kaepernick?

 

If you don't think people are giving up on it, then good for you. But how is it 'fading' if people aren't giving up on it, exactly?

This is where you try to deflect. GO!

 

Like I said, you're free to not believe that. Your reputation is well-earned.

Anyone who believes smug's stuff about me - you can see me disagreeing a lot with people because that's the nature of this discussion and I understand that. I've tried to disagree without making things personal, but inevitably sometimes when people give you constant abuse, it can be difficult. I didn't call Ozzy Mac any names when we disagreed for 2 pages. I haven't called EJK any names, and for the most part I've avoided that. When I said some people were racist, I didn't even name anyone because if it doesn't apply to you, then you can ignore it!


But smug, every time, I mean EVERY time he disagrees with someone, anyone, on this board, finds a way to attack them personally. He bullies people, he assassinates their character, and he does it with absolutely no chance of being pulled up because he is mates with the mods. He literally told bumblebee to **** off and die, and the mods banned bumblebee and smug edited the post

When people give me abuse they can expect it back. When people treat me like someone who just disagrees, then that's fine with me. You can all make your own mind up and I'm sure many of you think I'm a prick or whatever. That's ok with me, but all I can say is sorry, it wasn't my intention to come across like that, even when we disagree.

 

I'll leave this thread now, and I won't even respond to whatever smug says about me. Again, sorry to anyone who feels that I've been 'self-righteous' pr accused them of being racist - I haven't and it wasn't my intention to come across like that. Even if we disagree, I'm sure the vast majority of you are good people and if it feels like I was implying otherwise, again, I apologise.

 

Not me, I'm a twat.

 

You said people on here were racists but refused to name them ...

... that's why I don't bother debating with you too much, your mind is already made up.

You went on RTG, posted your usual essay and got very little response, almost no one agreed with you.

The only one to post a detailed reply told you to give your head a wobble.

That's all I have to say to you.

 

I would be shocked if any of them haven't heard of him. Given he's been personally victimised by the most powerful man in the free world, made global headlines for his protests and fronted one of the biggest ad campaigns for the world's biggest sports brands.

Say what you want about the guy but he's earned column inches.

 

The RTG thread on 'Black lives matter' repeating exactly what I've said about it losing momentum, etc ....

... amazing considering I don't even post on there.

 

Tidied for a bit of accuracy there.

 

Ok.

So your argument is that the black managers are not given a chance to manage football clubs because of racism?

The white people in charge of the clubs refuse to give these black managers a chance based on the colour of their skin?

So can you explain the following to me please...

Brazil World Cup 2014.

5 African countries played in that World Cup, those countries were:

Nigeria - White manager.

Cameroon - White manager.

Algeria - White manager.

Ivory Coast - White manager.

Ghana - Black manager.

@Kittenmittons it seems that the black countries are also racist against black managers, because 4 out of 5 of them choose a white manager.

Systemic racism huh?

 

@Kittenmittons can you explain why 4 out of 5 African countries used white managers at the World Cup?