Off Topic OLOF's political thread

It was Ell that said it (from the Bring Maggie Thatcher back party)

Or the BMTB

 

Even in her present state she would probably be a better PM than Johnson.

 

true... and in her present state she would be a better pm than when she was alive

 

This is a TR video with an interview with Jake Hepple who had the "White Lives Matter, Burnley" flew over the Etihad Stadium.

Since Jake had the banner flown, his life has been turned upside down by BLM, BLM supporters and the cucks who took a knee to BLM, their new masters.

If these cucks had took the time to research BLM and realise they are a Marxist Communist movement hell bent on destruction, would they have sacked Jake and his girlfriend.........would other people have lost their jobs for not taking a knee or speaking out against BLM.

Now everyone's slowly waking up to BLM, how many court cases will there be for wrongful dismissal, better still, how many companies will be scrambling to get those workers back with lots of apologies and under the table bribes.........food for thought.

Even the UK football world are now slowly waking up and distancing themselves from BLM.

Jake lost his job, despite police confirming he broke no laws, his girlfriend was suspended from her job, and probably now lost it.

There is a donation box if you'd like to donate to Jake and his girlfriend to help them through.

There are 2 links incase one don't work for you....click on the top or bottom videos...........Go Jake, Go Jake, Go Jake.

https://www.tr.news/exclusive-tommy-robinson-interviews-jake-hepple/

https://www.supportjake.co.uk/donate/

 

Jocky Boy, Jocky Boy, Jocky Boy,

You obviously don't know why "I see you", just random guesses. Give up while you're behind, you just keep humiliating yourself.

There's obviously enough coming out your lug holes, so I'm finished with it. Tra Jocky Boy....

 

And the push back continues as players and people start to wake up.

 

The look that says it all

 

So Trump poses at Mount Rushmore, who thinks he will be next president carved out of rock there.

 

Jesus wept

 

Surprising he hasn’t got them started yet!!!!

 

It's a superimposed cut out.

 

It's an old picture.

 

By now everyone will know Ghislaine Maxwell has been arrested by FBI in the USA. Maxwell is the alleged woman who groomed underage girls for Epstein.

For the record I'm a Royalist, I've made no bones about that in past. If Prince Andrew is a paedophile, as alleged by thousands (without proof) after it was revealed Prince Andrew knew, and met Epstein, then he should go down. I don't tolerate anyone who abuses, or sexually abuses young kids.

Many have analysed Prince Andrews interview with, none other than the BBC and the now disgraced BBC presenter. They were all looking for things to smear his name with no impartiality in my opinion.

Let's also note that most people, including on here would / may have friends who are paedophiles, rapists, murderers, criminals etc without knowing it.

Here's my analysis......because somethings don't add up, and pieces are missing.

Firstly, everyone's been focusing mainly on Prince Andrew (and the photo), not the clintons or other big names, just Prince Andrew.....imo....he's the biggest feather if they could get him, even though other big names have been mentioned.

The link below shows the photo of Prince Andrew with accuser Virginia Roberts (now Giuffre).

It's said Guiffre was 17 at time she allegedly had sex with Prince Andrew.

If he did (In Maxwell's house in England), and it's if, the age of consent in UK and USA is 16 since 1885, by both laws, he did nothing wrong, even if frowned upon by some.

So, considering a Royal don't go anywhere without their bodyguards, where were the bodyguards?...Royals whereabouts are known at all times for obvious reasons.

Most, if not all young girls dream of marrying a Prince and becoming a Princess, even a photo with a Prince is a dream come true............................Guiffre in the photo does not look like she's being forced to have the photo took, nor does she look under duress or upset, or abused in any way, even though Maxwell is in the background...........False smiles can't hide sadness in the eyes.

Also, Prince Andrew was very good friends with Maxwell for a number of years before Prince Andrew was introduced to Epstein. Hence being in Maxwell's house.

Epstein used many celebs and dignitaries who never knew about, or participated in his sick world of Paedophillia, it's how he made his money.

You can form your own opinions after watching the Virginia Giuffre interview below..........I haven't seen any analysis videos on Giuffre.

In this video below, Giuffre talks like she was present at every Epstein sex act.....would she have been?................Giuffre would've made a lot of money from the many national and International interviews she's done, have any other victims made as much money?

Giuffre states the photo being doctored is bull.........Notice Giuffres stance, then Andrews.......Also note how the BBC move the camera inwards when Giuffre starts talking about Andrews arm being elongated..........Remember, this is BBC Panorama.

Maxwell was arrested at her home in Bedford New Hampshire. The FBI had seen her a while before coming out a burger shop, but didn't arrest her.

My opinion is, the FBI knew where she was all along, and may have been waiting for certain visitors to pay Maxwell a visit.

Maxwell will give up names as a bargain plea deal, while Maxwell is a big fish, they want the bigger fish, they want bigger feathers. Right now, Maxwell will be in driving seat regarding her plea deal.

It's been said Maxwell will not give information regarding Prince Andrew, but really wants to squeal about the Clintons, it was said plurally.

If, again a big IF, Prince Andrew goes to America, he can't be arrested as he would automatically have Diplomatic Immunity, so that's not going to happen.

The only proof against Prince Andrew at moment, and as far as I can see is Giuffres accusation.

This the Suns version.

Giuffre said the photo isn't a fake cos of the date on the back of the photo..........question here is, how would Giuffre know there's a date on the back if she wasn't given a copy, and if she was, why hasn't she produced it to the media?

Taken from the Sun.

"Ms Roberts told the programme a date on the back of the photo shows it was printed on March 13, 2001 - just two days after it was taken"

Again, how did she get a copy, if she did, and how did she know it was printed 2 days later?........If Epstein took the photo, like Giuffre alleged, why would he give her a copy?........Epstein used all photos and video footage for his own personal insurance.

Giuffre claims she had sex with Prince Andrew on March 10, 2001......however, the Sun says Giuffre told the program the date on back of the print is March 13, 2001, taken 2 days after the photo was taken. Two days before March 13 is March 11...........it was when I went to school.

The Sun also claims Giuffre said Prince Andrew sweated a lot during sex, however, Giuffre also said the sex didn't last very long and was disgusting. Giuffre also claimed she was then forced to have sex with Prince Andrew on 2 other occasions.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10469698/prince-andrew-photograph-virginia-roberts-evidence/

Make your own minds up people, but for me, something doesn't sound right.

 

That girl really looks like she has been forced into this situation, doesn't she? I mean, she's really cringing away from him.

 

Read the whole post.

 

A picture is worth more than mere words. LL.