That is incorrect. More white males should be on TV in general to represent the demographics of society. If we look at roles in television white working class males are grossly under represented. The topical BBC own studies highlight this as an evidence base. Posters are making points about proportionality, fairness TV quotas e.g the BBC are aiming for and achieving % of employees from bame groups that go past actual demographic levels - white people are thus being discriminated against. Diversity does not have to mean less white.
I disagree with you and I think its a sad indictment of our society that some people think this about a family Christmas advert
Looking on twitter I am yet to see a single gay person who commented who was offended. Middle class white liberals strike again.
Nothing to do with the BBC. But I noticed that the advert for Dior sauvage with Johnny Depp (now a proven wife beater) is still being aired on commercial TV.
The Pogues had a simple message for Laurence Fox after he complained about BBC bosses removing a homophobic slur from “Fairytale of New York”: “F**k off.” In what can only be described as a true Christmas miracle, the band, whose infamous song is annually dragged into the crosshairs for its use of the word “faggot” in a lyric, waded into Fox’s mentions to, putting it frankly, destroy him while backing the move to edit out the word.
That old chestnut !!.....keeping the song in the spotlight means only one thing..............Royalties!
Yeah, it's needs to kept in the spotlight as I can't remember the last time I heard Fairytale of New York at Christmas
Same with the amount of gay people in roles. Organisations going woke for fear of being branded racist and homophobic which then creates discrimination.
Usually about 5 times a day, 7 days a week, for about 3-4 weeks leading up to Christmas, probably more now, with the publicity!!
it’s a discrimination that shall not be talked about, although how white working class males being left behind by society is starting to resonate even with the Liberal left. The fear the inhibiting cults of diversity, multiculturalism and political correctness creates is not anti racism. Real vile racism can be allowed to fester and propagate itself and authority turns its eyes elsewhere due to the racist card being applied. Tens of thousands of kids were being ****ed by racist paedo gangs and authority allowed it to happen and covered it up. The same fear is present in advertising. Companies are fearful of being labelled racist. Accusations of nebulous racism destroys lives, it will damage businesses ... Business cow tows to this viscious “Liberalism”. Great business. Situationism and publicity = air play. Small radio stations are charged a few quid a play, the mainstream it can be over a hundred pounds at peak times .. Kerching.
Do you realise how little money the band will be making from it being on the radio? Theres naff all money in music sales or play now, it’s all in touring. To make out that it’s all a money-making ploy is nonsense.
They still earn royalties on the quantity of air time, Nobody said a fortune but a steady earner every year
Bollocks, have you never seen “About a boy” Hugh Grant lives off royalties. Or are you saying I’m reading mainstream stuff again. Out of interest is it only our board that get wound up about black actors in adverts? Does it really hurt their feelings having to watch it? JGF telling us that in the 70’s few black workers? No **** Sherlock that is what it was like only mainly whites got the jobs
Have you been drinking the Welsh water again Rod........In all fairness to Rob, we were discussing music not films or was that sarcasm? lol
It’s a film about someone living of a Christmas song royalties. Because you don’t read mainstream media I will forgive your dafty comeback without knowing
What’s that got to do with music? The vast majority of music consumption is done online now. James Blunt reportedly earns £00.0004499368 per stream. If you take that amount, Fairytale of New York has earned about £6.8k per year on average from streaming. Add on radio play and you probably don’t even reach the average yearly wage, for one of the most famous songs ever. That’s without even giving royalties to Kirsty MacColl’s family as well. In the 90s they’d have made a fortune when people bought singles and albums but I’d imagine now it’s sod all.
spot on cor possibly an unpointed question! to be honest regarding just this board not got a clue 70% of the boards are inactive anyhows … as for their feelings I guess some might take umbrage, I DONT although the reality of some of the plots are a bit thin or some cheesy The latter part 70's and jobs I can only go by facts and experience …. THE MAIN FACT why there were fewer black people in "the workforce % " was they made up far less of the population! in the 60's and early 70's the major employers tended to recruit from existing family employee's .. ask older generations about where they worked and how they got a job? .. answer = my dad my grandad my uncle / aunt etc jobs were mainly assumed for life! "the clock or pocket watch for 40+ years" was common. THE 80'S was a bad time for everybody black or white over 3m unemployed …. I posted my working "history" with working alongside … and never had any issues ….