I still do not expect to see BOS in a QPR shirt again, unfortunately. If he does appear again for us, Warburton is a hypocrite.
Or maybe BOS wanted to play for us and Manning didn't, who know,. he's not playing too much for anyone now.. Looks like we are trying to sell BOS for peanuts as well.
Finglas, agree with this 100%. Although if BOS has signed/not signed I can't see that BOS has done anything wrong. But you cannot have one rule for one and another rule for someone else.
So much so, BOS's departure will leave us collecting a small token amount where as Manning got us a transfer fee of £250k. The fact that BOS signed a pre-contract agreement without even telling the club confirms to me that he has no interest in playing for this club, or getting us a few bob and that he is only interested in himself. Warburton needs to show him the door and make a clear statement that anybody looking to move to ANY other club will not be tolerated and it is a good chance for him to prove that he is consistent in how he treats all his players.
Not as I understand it, and the statement on the Official about him being a QPR player for the rest of the season unless Fenerbahce reach an agreement with the Club for his early release.
What a sh*t, it was all over SM yesterday but he never informed club until today. He won't play for us again that's for sure...
Sorry Oslo, I meant that BOS could sign for a non English side now and see the last 6 mths of his contract getting paid by US and perhaps, not caring if we were/are in a relation battle. I think it was BOB who always rated BOS and would like to know his take on this.
I rate him. Never understood how he takes as much flak as he does. If Champions League clubs are willing to take him he must have something. Poor on his part to sign for them without apparently notifying us but really he doesn’t owe the club anything. Like Manning, a lot of dross was played in front of him before he finally had a chance and came good.
Arrived late to this story... However if BOS has signed some contract without QPR knowing then get rid. I don't have time for players like this?
Huddersfield Town boss Carlos Corberan responds to Alex Pritchard QPR transfer rumours The Terriers midfielder has less than six months left on his current deal with the Terriers and has been linked with a move to Loftus Road to join back up with Mark Warburton SHARE BY STEVEN CHICKEN 17:05, 15 JAN 2021UPDATED21:06, 15 JAN 2021 please log in to view this image Alex Pritchard and Carlos Corberan(Image: CameraSport - Mick Walker) Sign up to FREE email alerts from YorkshireLive - Huddersfield Town FC When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time. Terriers midfielder Alex Pritchard has been the subject of transfer speculation this month with reports linking him with a move to Queens Park Rangers. That would mean a reunion with his former boss Mark Warburton, who managed him at Brentford in the most productive season of Pritchard’s career to date back in 2014/15. But his current boss Carlos Corberan insists that as it stands Pritchard will be treated the same as any other Huddersfield Town player and that he was happy with the midfielder’s contribution when fit earlier this season. Town could do with a playmaker type after Ajax loanee Carel Eiting suffered a potentially season-ending knee injury, and it has been reported that a transfer move to bring back Terriers academy graduate Duane Holmes from Derby County could be in the offing. please log in to view this image SOME NEWS FROM TOWN A fully-fit Pritchard would certainly be the kind of creative midfielder Town need in Eiting’s absence – he had looked good in that role against Nottingham Forest and Millwall back in October. But there would be sense in allowing Pritchard to leave before the end of the January transfer window and securing a longer-term replacement if such a pair of deals could be done. A number of Town’s squad players will be out on contract in the summer as it stands, and we understand the Terriers would be willing to consider selling one or two now if it allowed them to strengthen the first eleven for the second half of this season and beyond. please log in to view this image Ben Hamer was one such player before his departure to Swansea City, and Pritchard’s deal with the club is also set to conclude at the end of this season. MOST READ please log in to view this image Chris Wilder explains Jack Rodwell's absence from Sheffield United squad please log in to view this image Huddersfield Town's bad week gets worse with Watford result and Jonathan Hogg blow please log in to view this image Huddersfield Town player ratings as Ryan Schofield error proves costly vs Watford Corberan would not be drawn on such two-plus-two speculation, but did confirm that Pritchard will not be part of the squad to face Watford on Saturday afternoon despite returning to training this week after an injury. Corberan said: "We are working with the players that are here at the club and he is one of the players that’s working here with us. HUDDERSFIELD TOWN LATEST please log in to view this image Bromby comments on Hamer move please log in to view this image Why Town have let Hamer leave please log in to view this image Predicted lineup to face Watford “Unfortunately he’s had some problems during the year and that’s why he’s not had the minutes he could have. “In the minutes he was with the team he helped in terms of his effort and in terms of adapting to the ideas and we were happy with the performance he was showing. “We just need to be a bit cautious with his [injury] situation because we don’t want to miss any more players in the next weeks
BOS should be hung out to dry and up for sale to any interested bidder. His contractual arrangements with the Turks are his problem. QPR owe them no favours. After all I'm sure they had some part in persuading him to keep schtum about the deal they reached with him. They've saved themselves £8 million or whatever it was. Whether he goes there as a tub of lard is up to him. I''m not sure he has the self-discipline to keep himself fit but I';ll bet they have a get-out clause If we cannot get an interested buyer or he refuses to go, he can be sacked without notice or payment and then live off the money the Turks promised him for this year. Playing him with the kids sounds good but do you really want someone like that influencing them by the example he has set?