See, ye gettin' ****ing antsy because you know for a bang to rights fact you're wrong on this topic and can't handle not being on top in a thread gettin the likes that you absolutely crave how can you have the idiocy to call people making a stand lazy and sit there saying "lets just forget about it cos its Romans fault"
It's not dead in the water, it's just going to be reformatted. Hasn't this been in the oven for 10 years? They have patience.
You obviously havent read the whole thread or you’d have realised my role in this is to play devils advocate but more importantly your points are irrelevant considering your stance on loyalty
Not according to the actual PL it isn’t as they’ve openly stated that these clubs had broken rule L9 in their letter to the other 14 clubs. The rule states that no competition may be entered into without the prior approval of the board. They literally signed up and announced they’d entered one, that’d be starting ASAP. Had it ploughed on they’d have been in breach of contract, which they said they’d be prepared to fight. It’d have ended up in court no doubt, and they could have argued the nuances of the effective punishment for the rule break via 16 large per day contract lawyers. I’d be equally astounded if there wasn’t a substantial penalty for withdrawal, however context is everything and it may be deemed not in anyone’s best interests to pursue.
My points are irrelevant to you, because you don't like they weren't in support of you. I know how you operate Spurly, don't sit behind some bullshit now and pretend anything other than what this is.
Your playing them tonight Duncan has been giving it large but they have lost both games since they won promotion, losing three would put them back in their box
idgaf what you're supporting, that had nothing to do with my post if you cant play devils advocate without your feelings getting hurt i reckon you find a new role the post I replied to was complete and utter nonsense, I don't need any more context than that, apparently that made you upset
Yeah I’m fairly sure that’s an interpretation from another member. It’s cut and dry and interpretation can be undone by a contract lawyer on £50 an hour never mind top brass. Either way, contracts of this magnitude are never sealed whilst ignoring a major, integral stakeholder. They’ll probably still be punished but not under that rule, unless they want a fight bigger than they can afford to take on.
if you are not bothered about what I want then ****ing ignore my posts on this subject but you can’t because my posts dig at that disloyal **** living in he depths of your soul my feelings aren’t hurt mate...but you see this is my problem...you’re a ‘fan’ talking like you love the beautiful game, like you understand what loyalty means, like you care about the integrity of the game in this country yet you jump ship like these owners as soon as you think you’ve found a better option than your bread and butter. youve supported City and then Chelsea because Newcastle weren't good enough...you have no where to stand, no platform to talk from and any audience that entertains you on this topic must be just like you. just my opinion of course, maybe I just made it all up, you know what I’m like.