On the other side of the coin We've shown that when we make gentleman's agreements we stick to them, thereby making other players more likely to accept us at our word. So we could for example say to Cantwell give us a season and if we don't stay up you can go. Plus side for him is have a good season and his price / wages go up and we get the player for another year, possibly more if we stay up. No real downside for us unless he has a stinker and his value goes down. Solid bids may refer to players much lower down the food chain and SW may only have said that with a view to for example encouraging any suitors for Aarons to show their hand, possibly encouraging a bidding war. SW is shrewd enough to know that it's not only the fans who will be looking closely at what he has to say in relation to transfers. All this and the window still isn't open yet, interesting discussion but impossible to draw any conclusions yet.
If we survive next season there will be even more demand for our players We are unique in our business model and our owners are the second poorest in the top 2 divisions so there's no point expecting us to turn down crazy offers or waste money on big name stars. Apparently not wanting to be owned by a foreign billionaire is phobic of some sort Robby says but I prefer to have an identity and owners that only want us to succeed like the rest of most of our fans.
Clunk! I say good luck to Emi and I hope he goes on to realise his full potential (which would also benefit us). I'll say the same about Max if/when he leaves, like I have done for Maddison, the Murphys, Lewis and Godfrey. Good luck to them.
T There have, I believe, been several bids to take McCullum on loan for instance. I would guess many of our players will attract loan enquiries.
This is the tweet about Skipp: "Oliver Skipp spotted looking at houses for sale in Norwich today #ncfc#thfc" please log in to view this image
I believe elsewhere somebody has identified that the location is Duke Street, where there are properties on the market. The protective boot is a good indication it's a recent picture, rather before his move last summer.
Rumour has it that our new gambling sponsor is promoted by images of sexy ladies . I'm shocked and appalled this blatant heterosexuality is being shoved in our faces during pride week where anything but that is celebrated.
Quote: "We will be reviewing our due diligence process going forward". Why aren't we reviewing the sponsorship contract right now, never mind the due diligence process for the next one?
This is a photoshop job? If you look carefully, there is another pair of feet belonging to none of the three in full view. Looks as if OS and partner may have been pasted over whoever those feet belong to. Could of course be Ollie's Mum, or the girl's sister, or ........... maybe I'm just sceptical
See my edited post I should have guessed you would be sitting at your keyboard with fingers raised Duncan, waiting for responses to your previous post .....
Not sure why you think this is display of heterosexuality DD, I see a veritable bevy of potentially gay women. I can't speak to any blatant displays of heterosexuality they might have inspired where you are however
You're barking up the wrong tree I'm strictly Aromantic those ladies may possibly not be cisnormative tbf
Aromantic is how I like my rice. (And what better way to promote women's football than some lovely ladies bouncing their balls around?)