And that's the problem ned. he's been asked 3 or 4 times to name the fullbacks we should have been in for but never does. It's like a broken friggin record
I’m first to admit I’ve been horrifically impatient but this deal has completely made me trust the process. This is signs of a completely new Sunderland. He was the man we wanted and we’ve got him. Didn’t look likely at one point so moved on. Easy thing to do would have just settled for Gallacher despite the better target being available. Stuck to our guns and got him. Very impressed, I’ll now retire from sharing my doubts hahaha
No point you educating yourself. Oh ok. It's clear your looking to catch me out rather than discuss the issue.
To be fair half the board have been saying well get what we need without a shred of evidence. I hope they are right as I want promotion.
Dennis… been a decent name for us in the past (Tueart, Smith) Don’t believe it though. Why would we sign a left back. The people have all said it’s stupid how the club aren’t signing a left back. So we mustn’t be
This is obviously deliberate from you now and it's incredibly boring. Any chance you can give it a rest? It's been explained to you by many posters on here and even Lee Johnson himself. Yet, you keep repeating it to try and wind people up. If you are going to WUM try and mix it up a bit and keep it original. You've overplayed this tune, now
Seeing who's moved when you don't know who has is in itself gaining knowledge or educating yourself on the subject.
As someone who has a forename (real name) which was spelled not the usual way… I’ll give you that one! Still sounds the same though