No it wasn't! Nonetheless, I agree that one shouldn't have even been a booking, but once VAR has judged on it, they're loathed to turn it over.
Eh The FA after the event Not in the heat of the moment With calm heads and with hindsight have decided that the challenge that the ref yielded a red for as dangerous play was actually okay and the judgement was harsh Probably down to intension who knows what they were thinking So it’s exactly what I have been talking about Can’t have been accidental- this has been discussed It must have been dangerous because of what we discussed yet it was rescinded two incidents All I said from start was I THINK a yellow would have sufficed for the challenge on Bobby Because Even though it was dangerous and the foot that high No damage was caused It clearly was not intentional I have also said from start when you actually play football You know when you have been done and for me that’s when the red card should be used on the other incident you have someone who broke someone’s leg/ankle Unintentionally the injured player confirmed this Was sent off for dangerous play But for some reason had it rescinded which means intention and force must be the larger of the things the FA look at and if that is the case then the red the other night was harsh imho that’s all and I am wrong and I don’t care ftr I think the stench of hypocrisy on here can be strong sometime I will flounce now Cause otherwise this will never end