1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

British Politics

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Ciaran, Apr 20, 2020.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Archers Road

    Archers Road Urban Spaceman

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    53,846
    Likes Received:
    58,344

    It wasn’t really a school as such <ok>
     
    #40921
  2. petersaxton

    petersaxton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    23,690
    Likes Received:
    13,453
  3. Bwood_Ranger

    Bwood_Ranger 2023 Funniest Poster

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    57,220
    Likes Received:
    45,149
    The Tiger Woods lookalike work must have dried up.
     
    #40923
  4. petersaxton

    petersaxton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    23,690
    Likes Received:
    13,453
  5. petersaxton

    petersaxton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    23,690
    Likes Received:
    13,453
  6. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838
    Vote Sensible. x
     
    #40926
  7. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838
    Why not? An Australian/US citizen in Rupert Murdoch was picked every one of our PM's since 1979. :emoticon-0112-wonde
     
    #40927
  8. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    26,648
    Likes Received:
    10,668
    has picked*
     
    #40928
    Prince Knut likes this.
  9. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838
    Where would we be without you spell-and-grammar checking this site? <hug>
     
    #40929
    Archers Road and HRH Custard VC like this.
  10. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838

  11. pompeymeowth

    pompeymeowth Prepare for trouble x
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    22,675
    Likes Received:
    12,776
    Yes, I'm charming, you're offensive.
     
    #40931
  12. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838
    Channel migrants: protesters try to stop lifeboat rescue launch

    new
    David Brown
    Tuesday November 30 2021, 12.20pm, The Times

    please log in to view this image

    RNLI lifeboat crews have a moral and legal duty to rescue people in danger at sea, according to its chief executive
    HENRY NICHOLLS/REUTERS
    Share
    Save
    Protesters used a boat to try to block the launch of a lifeboat because they objected to the rescue of migrants crossing the Channel.

    Police were called to the Hastings lifeboat station on the Sussex coast after the attempt to stop the volunteer crew responding to an emergency call.

    One witness claimed the protesters shouted: “‘Don’t bring any more of those home, we’re full up, that’s why we stopped our donations’ — and that kind of really horrible stuff.”


    please log in to view this image


    An RNLI spokeswoman said: “We can confirm an incident was reported to the police. The lifeboat was able to launch and the station remains on service.”

    The spokeswoman said the lifeboat had been responding to a call on November 20 for a rescue operation overseen by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency.



    Last week 250 people gathered in the centre of Hastings for a vigil for the 27 migrants who drowned in the Channel when their dinghy sank.

    On November 16 Hastings RNLI inshore lifeboat picked up 35 men and five teenage boys who had spent two days at sea in a small dinghy.

    Nigel Farage, the former UKIP leader, had accused the RNLI in the summer of being a “taxi service for illegal imigration” for rescuing people crossing the Channel. The charity said that the criticism led to it receiving more than £200,000 in donations in a single day.

    Mark Dowie, chief executive of the RNLI, has said that it has a moral and legal duty to rescue migrants in danger in the sea.

    The RNLI had previously said: “There are instances where our crew at Hastings have had negative comments made to them about their rescues of those who have crossed the Channel, and they are aware of the heated debate in the press and social media on this issue.

    “However, Hastings RNLI receives overwhelming support from the local community. In common with other coastal towns around the UK, the people of Hastings understand that the volunteer crews of the RNLI will launch at all times of the day and night, often in very difficult conditions, to save the lives of those they have never met.

    “The crew do not judge the actions of the casualties they rescue, and will treat them all with compassion and respect.”

    No words.
     
    #40932
    pompeymeowth likes this.
  13. DUNCAN DONUTS

    DUNCAN DONUTS SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIOR

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2015
    Messages:
    61,565
    Likes Received:
    47,247
    I'm glad more illegals are drowning trying to flee France.

    They're not sending their best.

    The NHS should at least harvest the organs .
     
    #40933
    petersaxton likes this.
  14. Prince Knut

    Prince Knut GC Thread Terminator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2011
    Messages:
    25,482
    Likes Received:
    12,838
    Hope for us nice people from good families:


    Survival of the friendliest? Why Homo sapiens outlived other humans
    We once shared the planet with at least seven other types of human. Ironically, our success may have been due to our deepest vulnerability: being dependent on others

    HUMANS 24 November 2021
    By Kate Ravilious

    please log in to view this image

    Simon Pemberton

    HUMANS today are uniquely alone. For the majority of the existence of Homo sapiens, we shared the planet with many other types of human. At the time when our lineage first evolved in Africa some 300,000 years ago, there were at least five others. And if you were going to place a bet on which of those would outlast all the rest, you might not have put your money on us.

    The odds would have seemed more favourable for the Neanderthals, who had already adapted to live in colder conditions and expanded to inhabit much of Eurasia. Or Homo erectus, who had made a success of living in south-east Asia. By contrast, our direct Homo sapiens ancestors were the new kids on the block, and wouldn’t successfully settle outside of Africa until more than 200,000 years later. Yet, by 40,000 years ago, or possibly a bit more recently, we were the only humans left standing. Why?

    Many explanations have been put forward: brainpower, language or just luck. Now, a new idea is building momentum to explain our dominance. Ironically, it may be some of our seemingly deepest vulnerabilities – being dependent on others, feeling compassion and experiencing empathy – that could have given us the edge.


    Today, surrounded by computers, phones and all the other clever things we have invented, it is easy to pin our success on our cognitive abilities. But the more we learn about other types of human, the more they seem similar to us in this regard. In the case of Neanderthals, and possibly the mysterious Denisovans, this includes the ability to make sophisticated tools, such as projectile spears that enabled them to hunt large game. Similarly, we are discovering that artistic flair – a marker for the ability to think symbolically, and thought to be another vital ingredient for our dominance – wasn’t just the preserve of our species. Homo erectus etched patterns onto shells some 500,000 years ago and Neanderthals drew on cave walls.

    Join expert archaeologist Louise Leakey in Kenya: Explore the origins of humanity on a Discovery Tour
    More recently, the focus has shifted from intelligence to our ability to network with strangers: the survival of the friendliest. Archaeological evidence shows, for example, that Homo sapiens not only lived in larger groups than all other humans, but had an unparalleled ability to form alliances beyond their immediate group. It might be that these social abilities helped to make us the most adaptable humans, the only ones capable of occupying every single biome on the planet.

    Other humans certainly became adept at living in particular environments. Homo heidelbergensis and the Neanderthals, for example, had the cultural and technological skills – the ability to make clothing, fire and shelter – needed to branch out into colder climes. The diminutive newly discovered Homo luzonensis, along with Homo floresiensis (aka the hobbit), thrived in woodland environments. “But it is doubtful that these humans would have been successful if they were magically plopped down in the other’s habitat, whereas sapiens likely could have,” says Brian Stewart, an archaeologist at the University of Michigan.


    Stewart, together with Patrick Roberts, an archaeologist at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History in Jena, Germany, argues that our Homo sapiens ancestors set themselves apart by developing a new ecological niche, which they call the generalist specialist. “Not only could Homo sapiens generalise and expand across the world, but specific populations could also specialise in certain environments,” says Roberts. “Together, this allowed our ancestors to thrive in the face of climatic and environmental variability.”

    However, it still isn’t clear how we became the masters of adaptability. Now, Penny Spikins, an archaeologist at the University of York, UK, has a new explanation. She thinks that our emotional nature and frailties gave us the edge. “Our emotional neediness gave us the drive to connect with others,” she says. And expanding our network made us more resilient, allowing us to flourish in many different environments.

    To understand why, we have to turn the clock back around 2 million years to when these complex emotions appear to have emerged, and travel to southern Africa to meet our ape-like ancestor Australopithecus. Here, we find the earliest known examples of the possible care for sick or injured hominins, with evidence from the skeletons of individuals who lived with bone problems that would have caused pain and disability, such as a teenage boy with a spinal tumour. “They almost certainly received some level of help, being given food and protection, to survive with these conditions,” says Spikins, whose book exploring these ideas, Hidden Depths: The origins of human connection, will be published next year.

    Care in the community
    Examples in the archaeological record of caring for fellow hominins increase over time and are commonplace by the time Neanderthal communities emerge. One Neanderthal skeleton found in Shanidar cave in Iraq and dated to about 50,000 years ago shows signs of multiple severe injuries, including the loss of the right forearm and hand. But remarkably, this individual survived for 10 to 15 years after his accident, and was carefully buried when he died aged between 40 and 50. “His care must have been extensive,” says Spikins.

    This investment in caring brought benefits for the group as well as the individual. “It allowed humans to hunt dangerous animals whilst living with the consequences in terms of injury risks. And it also allowed longer lifespans, enabling grandparents to be involved in infant care, as well as passing on knowledge and skills,” she says.

    Explore key Neanderthal sites with archaeologist Rebecca Wragg-Sykes: On a Discovery Tour of France
    Archaeological evidence of those benefits becomes increasingly apparent as we get closer to the present day, showing humans hunting animals larger than themselves and working together to tackle particularly dangerous beasts, such as woolly rhinoceros, mammoths and giant Cape buffalo.

    But when Homo sapiens emerged, they took these collaborative skills one step further and began to extensively interact with others outside their own immediate group – something not seen before. Exactly what drove this is unclear, but large swings in climate in Africa would have made life difficult, and those who collaborated may have been more likely to survive. Around 320,000 years ago, in the Olorgesailie basin in what is now southern Kenya, people began to transfer obsidian – a highly valued volcanic glass used for spear points – over longer distances, up to 90 kilometres in some cases. This suggests that interactions were occurring with neighbouring groups. Over time, these long-distance networks expanded. By 30,000 years ago, Stewart and his colleagues have shown that Homo sapiens in southern Africa were exchanging ostrich eggshell beads over distances of more than 300 kilometres.

    This expansion of our social networks was a significant part of our success, says Chris Stringer at the Natural History Museum, London. “Interacting with more people allowed us to acquire behaviours and inventions from neighbouring groups, which may have aided survival.” By contrast, the Neanderthal’s apparently insular way of life may have cost them dear. Ten wooden throwing spears, excavated from a mine in Schöningen, near Hannover in Germany, and dated to around 300,000 years ago, would have enabled those who used them – perhaps early Neanderthals – to hunt big game from a distance. “You would assume that such a good invention could never be lost, but maybe within 10,000 years of the Schöningen people living there, the entire area was covered by an ice sheet and all these humans were gone,” says Stringer. “If these people weren’t part of a much wider social network then the technology that was special to their group would have died with them.”

    “If things had turned out differently, would it be Neanderthals’ ancestors here today?”

    Not only did such networks allow Homo sapiens to pass knowledge on, but they were an insurance policy for when times are bad. “If a drastic climate change occurred, then some populations might struggle, but others living in a different region might thrive, and may have been able to help out their neighbours. This would have allowed us to become incredibly resilient,” says Roberts.

    He and his colleagues have found evidence for this kind of supporting collaboration in the dense jungle environments of south Asia, some 50,000 years ago, when Homo sapiens first settled this region. These pioneers spread across this challenging environment with unprecedented speed. The isotope chemistry of bones found deep within the jungles of Sri Lanka reveal that Homo sapiens inhabited the rainforest all year round. “They became rainforest specialists, using bow and arrow to hunt monkeys and giant squirrels,” says Roberts. But artefacts found alongside their bones, such as marine shell beads and sharks’ teeth, indicate that they also had contact with populations from coastal regions. “What you end up with is a beautiful picture of two different populations – one in the forest and one on the coast – and they are communicating,” says Roberts.

    The more we look, the more we see evidence for increased social interaction and wider networks when Homo sapiens first emerge. But what gave us the courage to interact with our neighbours in a way not seen in other human lineages? Genomic analysis of a rare genetic condition known as Williams syndrome has recently shed light on this question.

    People with Williams syndrome are often hyper-social – trusting and happy to hug strangers. The condition is also associated with a range of health risks, including heart issues, and a distinct physical appearance, including delicate facial features such as smaller teeth.

    The syndrome is caused by small deletions of genetic material, of which one gene – BAZ1B – has been the subject of much research during the past decade. This gene is associated with the control of neural crest cells, which form the basis for many tissues during embryonic development and create the adrenal glands that influence our hormonal response to stressful events. The absence of this gene results in reduced migration of the cells, providing an explanation for the delicate facial features and health issues associated with Williams syndrome, as well as the reduced levels of fear, leading to hyper-social behaviour.

    The genetic changes associated with Williams syndrome caught the attention of Cedric Boeckx at the Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies in Barcelona, Spain. He wondered if they could help explain why our Homo sapiens ancestors started to expand their social networks in the past. Working with Giuseppe Testa at the University of Milan, Italy, the researchers compared the modern human genome with that of our closest relatives, the Neanderthals and Denisovans, and found that BAZ1B had undergone many more mutations in Homo sapiens, suggesting strong evolutionary selection pressure for traits associated with this gene. “It gives us a handle on the direction of genetic change that may have made us more tolerant of strangers,” says Boeckx.



    please log in to view this image

    Compared with Homo erectus (left) and Homo Neanderthalensis (right), Homo sapiens (centre) has more delicate facial features

    Natural History Museum, London/Science Photo Library



    What’s more, the same mutations may explain why Neanderthals are sometimes described as looking brutish, with their heavy brow ridges and robust jawline. “As well as making us less aggressive, these genetic changes seem to result in physical features that make us appear less threatening,” says Spikins.

    Essentially, it seems that our Homo sapiens ancestors “domesticated” themselves. Archaeological finds confirm that the softening of our facial features, with the development of smaller skulls, flatter faces and tinier teeth, starts to occur in our lineage around 300,000 years ago.

    The question then becomes what effect these changes had. To find out, scientists have looked at other species that have also undergone similar genetic changes and evolved in the “friendly” direction, such as bonobos – a highly social ape – and animals that have been deliberately domesticated, including dogs, sheep and cows.

    Compared with chimpanzees, which haven’t undergone self-domestication, bonobos are less scared of strangers and more willing to share and interact in a positive way with others at the borders of their territory. Similarly, dogs are more tolerant than wolves of living in a group with unrelated animals, and dogs have evolved flatter faces that are capable of more expression. “Being expressive enables greater communication and makes you less threatening,” says Spikins.

    “Our emotional neediness may have been our trump card during climate changes”

    In the case of Homo sapiens, it appears that we took expressiveness to another level, with the development of language. “It seems likely that language helped us to maintain our social networks and was one of the skills that enabled us to adapt to lots of different environments,” says Boeckx.

    There are, however, downsides to the social traits acquired during our long-running process of self-domestication. “Becoming more connected and tolerant towards other people gave us greater strength as a community, but our underlying drive to please others and belong to a group also makes individuals vulnerable to being lonely, depressed and anxious,” says Spikins.

    By 50,000 years ago, Homo sapiens had become well established across Eurasia, having finally burst successfully out of Africa. Then, between 50,000 and 40,000 years ago, there seems to have been a crunch, from which the Neanderthals and Denisovans were never able to recover. There was an intense cooling of the climate and a major volcanic eruption in Italy around 39,000 years ago, and a reversal of Earth’s magnetic field around 42,000 years ago, which together are thought to have caused major climate changes around the world.

    It is possible that our emotional neediness was our trump card during this difficult period. “Our drive to connect with others may have helped us to network more widely and cope better with the immense environmental changes at that time,” says Spikins. Luck certainly played a part too. Perhaps our emotional skills just happened to be the best tool to navigate this particular challenge. Had the environment been different, it might have been other types of human that were better equipped to cope. “If things had turned out differently, for example with a more stable climate, would it be Neanderthals’ ancestors here today?” says Spikins.

    As Boeckx says: “The history of humans is full of fits and starts, and we are just looking at a snapshot of the last time we got lucky.”

    New Scientist audio
    You can now listen to many articles–look for the headhones icon in our app newscientist.com/app
     
    #40934
  15. Gambol

    Gambol George Clooney's wee brother

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    59,942
    Likes Received:
    17,470
    Except we all descended from Adam & Eve. Idiot.
     
    #40935
    Ciaran and DMD like this.
  16. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    26,648
    Likes Received:
    10,668
    Geneticists, by tracing the DNA patterns found in people throughout the world, have now identified lineages descended from 10 sons of a genetic Adam and 18 daughters of Eve.

    So hello bro
     
    #40936
    Prince Knut likes this.
  17. Gambol

    Gambol George Clooney's wee brother

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2010
    Messages:
    59,942
    Likes Received:
    17,470
    We're all one big family. That's why we fight like **** all the time.
     
    #40937
    HRH Custard VC likes this.
  18. DMD

    DMD Eh?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    60,901
    Likes Received:
    50,499
  19. DMD

    DMD Eh?
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    60,901
    Likes Received:
    50,499
    London going further down the tubes.

    TFL crisis latest: Sadiq Khan admits entire Tube line may have to close.

    Khan told BBC 5 Live: “One of the things we are looking into is the possibility of closing a Tube line. Why? Because closing a Tube line will make the savings, the cuts, that we need to introduce if we are going to balance our books.”

    This could include the loss of 100 of the 700 bus routes and a reduction in frequency on 200 more routes, plus a nine per cent cut to Tube services.

    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/news...ave-to-close/ar-AARihGu?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531
     
    #40939
    HRH Custard VC likes this.
  20. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC National Car Park Attendant

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    26,648
    Likes Received:
    10,668
    They (Londoners) voted for him, the will suffer
     
    #40940
    DMD likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page