I am asking what you expected him to do. All I ever wanted for Celtic was a level playing field with the same opportunity to win as anyone else.
What I expected him to do is the wrong question (if it was the right question then he wouldn't have proven his corruption in forcing sick people to play football because he was friends with a rival official) The question is, if there were two Scottish teams both going for the same prize (and no other team could), would an official who was friends with someone at one of the teams be allowed to force the other team to play while ill, or would he rightly be accused of corruption
I believe harry and superhoops have dossiers on the matter of corruption in Scotland. Ask for their opinions
You picked a bad example with Scotland. In Scotland you'd be called paranoid. Even when you prove you are right, you'd still get called paranoid. Here, I don't see what could be done.
Fine Richard Scudamore was corrupt in favour of Arsenal because David Dein is his friend and forced their local rivals to play while sick Any other league is an hypothetical example
I don't think that evidences corruption. I accept it is enough for you to ask the question. I accept it is enough for you to feel a grievance. I just don't know what could be done, especially with the time frame involved.
You ****s need to get to your beds at a decent hour. Sitting talking pish on the internet at 1am And no even a pished up rant from Gambol or Monaco!
WeebleBhoy must have bags under his eyes like parachutes. ****'s never off the internet. If he's not on here boring all and sundry into a coma, he'll be on some other mongo forum or lying in bed listening to Celtic/Republican Podcasts until 4am. Apart from that, he comes across as a very well rounded individual.
Incorrect. You just pay more heed to my posts because they are the most interesting and thought provoking.