Fabregas Saga Set To Rumble On.

statistically speaking, i've survived every day i've lived so far, so the chances are i'll never die.
but then every man that's ever lived has died, so the certainty of me also dying is almost 1.

statistics, gota love em.

 

But do you have enough evidence to conclude that you are the most intelligent being on earth?

How many people have you actually compared intelligence with, and how can one actually measure, or record, intelligence?

For example, you may stipulate that exams are a suitable method.

However, I attained lowly in certain areas in my GCSEs because of several independent factors (including going into one English exam slightly stoned for a bet) and so therefore my GCSE results differentiated from my AS and A levels.

 

i was actually referring (geek warning) to Hal from 2001: A Space Odyssey since the addition of 1 to 1 in its simplest form is i think based on the addition of 2 hydrogen nuclei together, to form helium. but the energy contained in a helium nucleus is very very slightly less than that in the constituent parts, even when you account for heat etc. the energy goes somewhere, because it cannot be created nor destroyed (thermodynamics laws) but apparently...it disappears.

also, in binary, the addition of 1 to 1 = 2. the addition of 11 = 3.

 

statistically, based on grades and qualifications achieved i'm viewed as intelligent. to me, this proves i have knowledge in certain areas, however, without wisdom, all the knowledge in the world is pointless, and there are very few (if any) ways to measure wisdom.

 

Well would you put a tomato in a fruit salad?

 

Trololololo. You guys just don't understand trolls do you.

 

What ever team you support after reading the droll you have come out with i have come to the conclusion that...

1, Your a pleb,
2, definitely not as clever as some of the other posters. they post with intellect.
3, well ermm i don't like you as most of your comments have nothing relating to fab's and leaving....

That is all.

 

Er no, if you add 1 to 1 in any numerical system, funnily enough it equals 2.

But 1 and 1 in binary is 1
But this is a boolean operator and not a numerical one

 

So probabilities aren't an artificial construct.

And tangible things aren't absolute in their nature

Right

Stop pretending please.

 

Great. My thread has turned into a ****fest because jayramfootball felt the need to demonstrate his superior intelligence by failing to capitalize the letter I in the middle of sentences.

What a prick.

 

Nerd.

 

As i said.....Nerd.

 

Ok im not going to bother to get into some sort of stupid arguement.. I just think half the stuff you write is pure crap tbh. xoxo

 

Given all the **** you have posted on the old 606 you can't really expect us to think that you are clever.

 

You are seeking attention though.

 

My main purpose of going on a football forum is to talk about football, not to get everyone else's attention. Can you say the same?

 

I have an idea how to sort this out - Jayram you effectively lost a bet and vanished off the face of 606, wasn't it you predicting we'd lose to Chelsea? Well lets have another spin at the bet when the new season starts up and as a bonus you can have the pick of the match that we'll lose.

 

But its not my main purpose, whereas for you it seems to be

 

a much better and quicker way

pick a time tomorrow, at that time pick any quick IQ test to complete, when time is up we post a link to the score

winning jayram gets to stay

 

Sounds a good idea!