Off Topic Climate Change

Discussion in 'The Premier League' started by Looney Leftie, Oct 28, 2018.

  1. Looney Leftie

    Looney Leftie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    3,176
    Mentioned before in the old politics thread that this should be separate so here it is

     
    #1
  2. Tel

    Tel Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    37,509
    Likes Received:
    23,786
    We all need to keep our fridge doors open a few seconds longer.
     
    #2
    SaintsForTheWin likes this.
  3. Tobes

    Tobes Usual bland and inoffenSive title

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2012
    Messages:
    57,815
    Likes Received:
    31,050
    #3
  4. Looney Leftie

    Looney Leftie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    3,176
    I reckon that vid might be enough to kill him :)
     
    #4
    Tobes likes this.
  5. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    21,851
    Likes Received:
    7,504
    I like warm weather.

    Burn more coal
     
    #5
    Commachio likes this.
  6. Commachio

    Commachio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    69,804
    Likes Received:
    25,875
    Had snow yesterday, if that helps
     
    #6
    Tel likes this.
  7. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    21,851
    Likes Received:
    7,504
    I just had rain, but it was cold
     
    #7
  8. Commachio

    Commachio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    69,804
    Likes Received:
    25,875
    You mean coke?
     
    #8
    HRH Custard VC likes this.
  9. Commachio

    Commachio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    69,804
    Likes Received:
    25,875
    I'd be worried if it was warm.. Probably means you've strayed into the wrong type of place.
     
    #9
    HRH Custard VC likes this.
  10. HRH Custard VC

    HRH Custard VC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    21,851
    Likes Received:
    7,504
    Coal
     
    #10

  11. Commachio

    Commachio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    69,804
    Likes Received:
    25,875
    It all changed to coke man..
     
    #11
    HRH Custard VC likes this.
  12. Milk and 1 other person

    Milk and 1 other person Grasser-In-Chief

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2013
    Messages:
    25,826
    Likes Received:
    8,421
    Coke doesn't burn... Too wet :bandit:
     
    #12
  13. Stan

    Stan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2014
    Messages:
    42,228
    Likes Received:
    23,640
    Move to Saudi
     
    #13
  14. Looney Leftie

    Looney Leftie Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2016
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    3,176
    Unsubsidised energy prices in the US
    please log in to view this image
     
    #14
  15. PhheHdee

    PhheHdee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    2,234
    This video is extremely exclusive to any literature and political advocacy that agrees, what is missing is the vast amounts of evidence to the contrary. Its an hour of, 1 assumptions leading interpretations. 2. Omission of relevant facts and findings. 3 gross cherry picking

    It omits the fact that the IPCC does not look at natural causes of climate change in any of its reports. WG1 never looked at natural causes, so, how can you separate natural from man made IF you want to determine which is which

    This is why no one can say how much is human and how much is natural warming

    Also, ALL of the actual evidence for sea level rise shows no problem, not only that, but the atolls claimed to be doomed are growing, not vanishing. Of the 1200 solomon Islands, the majority of them are growing not vanishing, yet we were told they were vanishing.

    No mention in this at all is the recent reviewed and accepted audit of the HADCRUT data set (that the met office, used to make corrections to their data with) though they didn't correct for the cooling bias in their data adjustments, sites that seen changes in hadcrut data, had all data previous to that site change cooled, that was the process they followed, creating a fake warming trend.

    I mention the Hadcrut data set because it is central to the IPCC's claims.

    Nowhere is it mentioned in this video that for the first couple of decades in the Hadcrut data set, there is one data point for the entire southern hemisphere.
    Nowhere is it mentioned that in the same data set, there are SST data points from ships that were 80KM inland.
    Nowhere is it mentioned that anomalies are statistical estimations that produce anomalies that are smaller than we can measure with thermometers we use

    Nowhere is it mentioned that we have less than 80 years of reliable modern temperature record, with coverage being very poor until the 1950s.
    Nowhere is it mentioned that in geological history, 600 million years of it, CO2 has never ever led temperature, it has always lagged

    Why is it that they won't talk about the fact that every claim of doom, they are making now, were made 30 years ago, and that every prediction failed, sea level, temperatures, agricultural losses, drought, heatwaves, all of it was wrong.

    There is no evidence in geology at all for catastrophic dangerous AGW
    There is no evidence for ocean acification.

    Explicit evidence means there can be no other cause as such, there is 0 explicit evidence for AGW being 1 dangerous, 2 driving all warming or most, and I challenge you to post some

    The slant in this video is typical of activism.

    So to that end lets take one claim at a time.
     
    #15
  16. PhheHdee

    PhheHdee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    2,234
    What amazes me most is, a 1% to 2% change in cloud cover over 120 years can explain pretty much all warming and cooling.

    Here is the data, a correlation between temperatures and cloud cover, that is VASTLY better than any CO2 temperature correlation ever was

    Cloud cover reduces, temp goes up at the same rate of increase, and as cloud cover % plateaus and is consistent, so is the primary data set of the IPCC, the HADCRUT data set, plateauing and correlating amazingly well with cloud cover.
    please log in to view this image

    "In conclusion, natural cyclic change in global cloud cover has a greater impact on global average temperatures than CO2. There is little evidence of a direct feedback relationship between clouds and CO2. Based on satellite measurements of cloud cover (ISCCP), net cloud forcing (CERES) and CO2 levels (KEELING) we developed a model for predicting global temperatures. This results in a best-fit value for TCR = 1.4 ± 0.3°C. Summer cloud forcing has a larger effect in the northern hemisphere resulting in a lower TCR = 1.0 ± 0.3°C. Natural phenomena must influence clouds although the details remain unclear, although the CLOUD experiment has given hints that increased fluxes of cosmic rays may increase cloud seeding [19]. In conclusion, the gradual reduction in net cloud cover explains over 50% of global warming observed during the 80s and 90s, and the hiatus in warming since 1998 coincides with a stabilization of cloud forcing."

    Sunshine and max temps with UK stations, who'd have guesses it gets warmer when there is less clouds eh. Strange you never hear clouds mentioned when we have heatwaves or warm summers. ;)
    please log in to view this image


    The correlation, pisses over CO2 v temperature correlation
    please log in to view this image




    The IPCC claims changes in clouds is caused by CO2 forcing (MORE FORCING MORE CLOUDS), it is central to their claims, but CO2 forcing increased during the periods above, and cloud cover decreased, and temperatures match cloud cover for the period, this is exactly the opposite of what IPCC reports claim
     
    #16
  17. PhheHdee

    PhheHdee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2018
    Messages:
    3,744
    Likes Received:
    2,234
    There is no such predictive model in science called "climate change". There is no theory called climate change.
    There is Anthropogenic global warming.
    There is attribution studies on AGW that ASSUME" computer models are correct, that attempt to predict the future but they are all in separate fields of science, with no link to each other and none of them can ever be validated if they claim things will happen in 2100, we'll all be dead, and almost all of them come from computer models, not current observational science. Fact

    What there isn't is a unified workable predictive theory called climate change, climate change is a political term, not a scientific one.
    No one even attempts to predict global climate changes. The term is nonsense

    and.. any and all predicted local climate changes of doom have been wrong.

    We are supposed to have 50 million climate refugees as of 2010, there wasn't even 1 to date. The UN tried to scrub the claim from its websites, and botched it, which is why we know.

    Manhattan is meant to be submerged by now, as claimed in the late 80s by Hansen at NASA
    IN fact at New York battery, sea level rise has slowed down and flatlined since 2008

    Note there is no CO2 signal at all in New York's sea level data, how could that be?! lol
    please log in to view this image
     
    #17
    Last edited: Nov 3, 2018
  18. Commachio

    Commachio Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2011
    Messages:
    69,804
    Likes Received:
    25,875
    ****ing hell, these are like Fosse posts.
     
    #18
    Tel, pieguts, gooner4ever and 2 others like this.
  19. Spurlock

    Spurlock PLAYA

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    33,774
    Likes Received:
    25,584
    I think P diddy is trying to tell us that it might rain this afternoon
     
    #19
  20. Big Ern

    Big Ern Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    11,516
    Likes Received:
    4,201
    The IPCC is chaired by a man who worked most of his career for Exxonmobile, one of the leading oil companies, no conflict of interest there.
    Does he have a good explanation for coral bleacing and ocean hypoxia? The first is caused primarily by an increase in temperature and has been increasing markedly since the 80's. As for the increasing size of atolls.
    please log in to view this image
     
    #20
    Looney Leftie likes this.

Share This Page