HDM is not noted for accuracy, but they're more mitigation than alleviation and won't be as robust as the original dock was for that.
Absolutely. Add in the complications of its origins, and the extent and the complexities become clear. People get fixated on the sea level aspect, which in reality isn't necessarily the most significant. It can be interesting to look at how they measure tide height, as that too is far from straightforward, and a lot of those looking at 'remedies' just accept a simple figure. Hull has many similarities to New Orleans, and the people involved in that are having an input.
Now there’s a surprise, beer and sandwiches all round. Have Barrett’s applied to build high rises in the Maldives yet?
A lot of similarities. How many people walking along Whitefriargate in the early hours listening to the jazz and blues wafting out of the all night clubs have thought they must be on Bourbon Street?
Celebrating small victories, for the first time the signed off agreement includes a reference to fossil fuels. FFS that was the 26th COP
They were always going to have to come up with a compromise to get everyone on board, they actually seem to have done better than most expected.
If you take the target of limiting the rise to 1.5c by the end of the century. Then add up all the commitments / promises made during this COP they equate to 9% of what is required.
For those interested, Jeremy Rifkin's book, "The Green New Deal" (1st edition published Sept. 2019) outlines the many complexities associated with trying to get control of the "climate change" issue(s). An excellent read, one of many he's written. He does have his critics, but i.m.o. talks a lot of sense. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Rifkin
If it's not good enough for Greta, it's not good enough for me... https://metro.co.uk/2021/11/02/gret...hove-your-climate-crisis-up-your-ae-15525480/
Can't see this doing much to help the climate, although some will get rich from it. please log in to view this image