Off Topic Dark Matter and other Astronomy information.

No you tried to start from when the ice was already melting just after it was freezing. It was an epic failure, most likely because you dont know anything, you picked up your ice argument somewhere, it makes no sense to say "oh there is as little ice as 36 years ago"

Why only 36 years? Because it suits your false argument.
What you completely fail to understand is, if global warming is real, there should be far less ice than 36 years ago..

is that lost on you?

Are you forgetting over 20 years of "melting antarctic will raise seas causing 50 million climate refugees" ?

No?
This is like your relativity argument, or lack thereof.

The hypothesis you believe in contradicts what you just posted.. and you cant see it, because you just dont know what you are talking about lad, how many ways to I need to drum it into your head.

Did you even go and learn about relativity after all your non arguments?
I can cherry pick, there is far more sea ice than in 2005.. big gains. is that too short, 36 years is just right is it?

Thick you are, good arguments you have not. "pick holes blah blah" << stick to this type of comment instead of advertising how you uninformed you are

 

@Diego New documentary out Climate hustle. Trailer, starts off well.

 

So I get bored of asking you the same question without reply for 2 days and decide I'm not going to waste anymore time on it, after having asked the same question thirteen times - and watched as you used diversion, lies and amnesia as reasons why you hadn't answered it.

You've translated this into it somehow being a Sisu victory and have started your pathetic victory dance again.

You are certifiable mate, proper batshit mental. Go seek help.

 

There was a news article on the Beeb last night about penguins adapting to climate change and shrinking food supplies.
It was at a place called Moot Point.
Who'd have thought geographers had a sense of humour?

 

So even the penguins are part of this global #fraud

Shocking.

 

Well they do wear smart suits so they're bound to be dodgy.

 

Maybe the excess polar bears could be ground up and used to feed them, that way the evidence against global warmer my would be hidden?

 

I'd have thought a grown up highly educated guy would know that grind up polar bears and then transporting them to the antarctic to feed penguins would only exacerbate the warming crisis.....

Let's keep the bear meat in the north and grind up whales instead. Local food sources and all that carbon reducing good stuff no?

 

Why dont the polar bears eat all the penguins,............

.

 

See above....

 

What global warming.

We have just entered a heating/cooling cycle and everything can be bounced off that. On the plus side, the process can be reversed when penguin numbers are required to be culled and rebuild the polar bear population

 

The one made up by the lizards to ensure total control of the planet by forcing people to believe in fraudulent science.

It's a very cunning plan.

 

More nonsense, abuse and drivel

Show me where you asked the same question 13 times and never got an answer?
Is that your excuse for AGAIN, blabbing on about me ignoring your question (when you ignore every single on of mine ironically, and conveniently forget I am usually replying IN DETAIL to three people) and when AGAIN I ask you, you again refuse to ask the question that your so called argument is dependent on..

Weird. It must be like one small sentence and you refuse to ask this question

Instead you come back after a rodgering and have a meltdown

What is this mysterious question? Still wont ask it huh, yet it is supposed to "own me"

 

Cos they are in different parts of the world?

 

Explain how that works, seeing as I never mentioned penguins, explain how what saint posted relates to CAGW please

 

PJ left his failed glacier argument, and Tobes his Finland argument, instead they are here talking about me again.

Why do the same people refuse to actually discuss this rationally, and why do they get offended when I respond to "conspiracy" crap with some derision of cognitive abilities/? Backed by the failure arguments for already existing "beliefs"

Tobes used "believe" a lot as well as "denier" am I in church>

PJ's argument is I am a "oil shill" and a "carbon shill" what's a carbon shill?

PJ you drive dont you, and use leccy, well I never drove and I am using nuclear power, who's the carbon shill really

 

please log in to view this image

 

And this is the response, all you have left.

You know, you posted reams of stuff, but said you cant post a single sentence question? That actually doesn't add up. Sort your story out and also, ask the question related to the topic

 

Also it would be nice if you can back up your "13 unanswered questions" claim, at least then I can answer these mysterious questions. Just possibly you might then answer at least one of the 20+ different questions I asked you