Derby doomed

Just a quick skeg
****jng hell

 

But they sacked Brucie for Murinio, Conte, Zidane, Anceloti, Poccetino, and a dozen others before they got down to Eddie.

 

I've seen lasses out on the lash where their face mask is the most substantial piece of clothing they're wearing.


I'm often in Whitley Bay though.

It's a ****ing **** hole.

 

Good social club with Star Turn on though.

 

And cheap Federation beer.

 

Pump up the bitter...

 

What are you talking about, I don’t have any other usernames?
It’s nothing to do with settling for less, there’s just no need to be so negative about Hull and City all the time.

 

Sorry I can't understand your accent.

 

Do you get both for £30k or just the one?

 

Apparently part of the deal involves other monies that were owed, so it's not a full reflection of the value.

At that price, it could be worth looking at some of the lesser players to have as a pet.

 

https://www.mfc.co.uk/news/club-statement-derby-county

A statement from Middlesbrough FC...
MFC is aware of the media speculation regarding its claim against Derby County and has read last night's statement by the EFL. The club wishes to ensure that, to the extent possible given that the arbitration claim is confidential, the full facts are in the public domain, rather than ill-informed speculation.

Why are MFC bringing a claim now?
MFC became aware that Derby County was cheating under the P&S Rules during 2018/19. MFC first intimated a claim against Derby County in May 2019 immediately following the end of the 2018/19 season. The claim was held in abeyance whilst the EFL Disciplinary Proceedings against Derby County were followed through to a conclusion. MFC then sent Derby County a Letter Before Action in the autumn of 2020 and started arbitration proceedings against Derby County in January 2021. Derby County used various procedural tactics to seek to delay the proceedings and as a result the claim has yet to be finally determined. MFC is not responsible for the delay. Had it been finally determined, and an award made in favour of MFC, there would be no dispute that MFC would be a Football Creditor.

It is said the claim has no prospect of success so why continue?
Given that the claim is confidential, MFC does not understand how people can assert it has no prospect of success. MFC is a commercial organisation and would not pursue frivolous litigation at huge costs unless it had been advised that there is a good prospect of success. The claim is not limited merely to the amortisation issue in respect of which a Disciplinary Panel have already found Derby County to have breached the P&S Rules. Without breaking the confidentiality of the proceedings, in simple terms, MFC allege Derby County and its directors systematically cheated under the P&S Rules and that such cheating affects the integrity of the competition. At least two clubs, namely Middlesbrough and Wycombe, were directly affected by the cheating, albeit in different seasons. In simple terms so far as MFC is concerned, had Derby County not cheated, MFC would have been in the play-offs. However, Derby County did cheat and, as a result, MFC lost the opportunities that arise as result of that.

How can MFC hold the administrators and EFL to ransom in demanding that its claim, reported to be worth over £40m, be met in full as a condition of the share in the EFL transferring?
That is not what MFC has said. The club believes that it is a Football Creditor but accepts that, as things stand, the size of the debt due is unknown. All MFC have said is that any new owner should be required to honour the final decision of the Arbitration Panel on behalf of Derby County once that is known. There is a certain inconsistency to the arguments presented by the administrators. On the one hand, it is said that there is no prospect of the claim succeeding, in which case there is no risk for a new owner. But, on the other hand, the administrator apparently cannot find a new owner because they will not proceed without the claim being settled due, presumably, to the fact that it has merit and might succeed. If the claim has no prospect of success MFC does not understand why a new owner would resolve the matter by accepting that the arbitration decision should be honoured. Of course, if the claim has a value as MFC believes, there is no reason why MFC should not, as a Football Creditor, be entitled to recover the monies due to it.

Why is Steve Gibson refusing to compromise the claim?
MFC has made it clear since the administrators were appointed that it was happy to discuss how the claim is dealt with and whether a compromise could be reached with the administrators or the new owner. The administrators contacted MFC in November 2021. However, there has been no contact at all since then, until this week. The administrators ignored MFC’s correspondence from November and MFC’s offer to continue engagement. MFC has made clear that it does not wish to see Derby County fall into liquidation, and that MFC is happy to be realistic in its expectations in order for Derby County to exit administration. However, it is ultimately up to the administrators or the new owner to put a firm and realistic proposal forward or merely agree that MFC’s claim, when finally determined, will be met in full by the new owners.

 

And some think we have problems due to owners.

https://dcfcfans.uk/forum/4-derby-county-forum/

 

Somewhat ironic.

 

Lifted from the gruniard, an article on Readings demise

It is a similar story to Derby in that exorbitant spending has been a key factor in Reading’s demise from play-off finalists five years ago to the prospect of lining up in the third tier for the first time since 2002. Reading’s 2019-20 accounts show a wages-to-turnover ratio of 216%.

216 per ********** cent???

Anybody still a tad miffed the sale of City to these people fell through?

 

As many on here have advised, people should always be careful what they wish for, as the wishes may just come true.

Without looking back, I'm sure there will have been some claiming ITK that were singing their praises too.

 

The fact they have won something, unlike City, explains Bury's larger fanbase no doubt.

 

For all we know Illicali may be worse. There is no evidence he will be financially reckless, and all the signs are pointing that him taking over from the Allams will be a much needed re-boot for the club and I'm really looking forward to it. However, any new owner for any club brings uncertainty - you spins the wheel, you takes your chances.

 

Maybe they invested / threw loads of money just as the supporters hoped for but the players and manager let them down.