I see it as the hierarchy at the club need him to build bridges that have formed between the players and the coaching staff. They need him to align with Pellegrino et al and him being very popular with the players this will make less easy for the dissenters to voice an opinion. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I always saw that role as a made up job to keep him at the club until he was ready for something else.
First game after SKD gets his new gig and Fraser gets dropped. It was Colonel Mustard in the Lounge with the Lead Pipe. Am I reading too much into this?
Are you sure? From the evidence of FF, he should be sacked for taking a very expensive player in great form and within a couple of seasons turn him into a complete jibber ing wreck of a keeper
Out of interest, what are you basing that on? Not saying you're wrong but interested to see what you're basing that comment on.
I just remember how highly regarded and rated he was when he joined, and he was the Head of England Goalkeeping at one point. You don't get to that position if your ****ing useless, as far as I'm concerned! I think our moronic fans have more to do with making him a jibbering wreck of a keeper than Dave Watson.
Is this dropping of Fraser to give him additional coaching? Or to rest an old injury? It would be interesting to know. Cricketers are often removed from the front-line and given net practice. Could that be what is going on here?
SKD to be manager at Fulham game. Would truly reflect the board's muddled thinking in the past 12 months