Match Thread: Crystal Palace v Watford

A billionaire owner who is going to donate £100,000,000 to us free of charge to renovate the stadium, pay off the debt, buy new players and recruit Jesus as manager.

They need to wake up and smell the coffee. We are in a far better position that Pompey, D+R, Rangers and many many more.

 

amen! And lets face it, we don't know how much money Baz is going to pour in..he may even be that £100,000,000 owner

 

well lets work it out.

 

you're asking me to do maths at 1:41am? I can't do maths when i'm awake, let alone now! lol

 

Well i would make this


item ammont (£)
players £1,500,000
pitch £1,000,000
big screen £100,000
SW corner £2,800,000
Red lion £500,000
East stand £9,000,000
Bonds £3,000,000
Total £17,900,000

But i might be well out.

 

only £500,000 for the red lion? Still you're probably right...

 

Thats what it said in the WO the other day. But thats nearly 18million in the space of about 3 years.

 

....well that's a bundle of cash!

 

I know i aint got that to throw away. Thats what he is pretty much doing. But i have faith in the guy.

 

i have no reason to not trust him, except what i've heard..so..i'm waiting to see what he delivers before passing judgement.

and on that slightly non-positive note, i'm going to head to bed ...see you tomorrow hon..have a great night!

 

Night Night H. I will be here a while. The PPV doesnt end till 3.

 

A bit like Nigel Pearson did not under estimate us "We know how Watford play", and that was better than his team. He took us for granted.

 

I have just got into the BBC site and seen the goals of saturday. I do not like to criticise SL but sometimes I get upset with him as he does make some very bad judgements.

Goal 1. Should Scott Loach have held the ball? There was no pressure on him and to let the ball go when he did was not good with the locals attacker arriving.
Goal 2. Should Scott Loach have been more commanding? If he had come for the ball it was his. To stop and go back was a bad judgement.
Goal 3. I think the goal should have been cancelled as the player who passed it to the scorer was I think offside and in that position interfering with the game.
Goal 4. The player scoring should not have been allowed to enter that position.