Meghan and Royal Family ****e

please log in to view this image

Mark James Slingsby EST 1972

@mjs121272
·
May 30

Prince Harry suffers huge US backlash - 'If you don't like it here, head back to Britain!'

please log in to view this image

Prince Harry suffers huge US backlash - 'If you don't like it here, head back to Britain!'
THE American backlash against Prince Harry has continued to erupt, as the popularity polls for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex "on both sides of the Atlantic are plummeting".
express.co.uk

 

https://www.change.org/p/uk-parliam...ove-all-titles-for-meghan-markle-prince-harry

Remove the titles

 

Nearly there. Good luck.

 

at some point you hope the penny will drop and he will keep his mouth in neutral whilst his brain decides it is best to keep the mouth and say nothing.

 

Maybe the Queen should get a new Corgi and name it Meghan?

 

Del blames China

please log in to view this image

@DelGeezer
Suggested new baby should have been called Georgina Floydina.

 

please log in to view this image

 

We are expecting a new grandchild in August. I have just instructed my daughter not to call her "Tubbs"

 

Are these gold diggers still getting airtime?

 

Yeah, that Lilybet, what an evil bitch.

Surely Kate Middleton is a bigger gold-digger than Meghan Markle, who already had a personal fortune before marrying Harry.

 

Apparently Markle had $5m when she met Harry, which is chickenfeed compared to her ambitions, which seem to be to compete with the Kardashians.

Some debate at the moment, as to whether Harry notified the Queen about using the very personal Lilibet name for their Sussex brand. The Palace says not. Unknown sources for Harry said he did.

Truly disrespectful if he didn't.

 

Was she christened Lilibet365 or was it, Sportsbet or perhaps if it was a boy, it should have been BetVictor or BetFred?

 

Would be great now they’ve completed their family if they’d disappear from the news but you know there’s no chance of that.

 

You need to read up on her past.

 

This lilibet thing will end up with another Oprah interview. A few tears to camera 1 and Stroller will be on here complaining how nasty the Royals are.

 

I have very little interest in Harry and Meghan, or indeed the wider royal family. It just amuses me to witness the gammon anger they provoke.

 

I couldn't give a to22 about some dumb American actress. However I know through reading about her before Harry, that she was a social climber and money hungry.

 

I can't believe you lot are still getting hooked by this freak show - who really gives a **** what some posh twat names his kid 2000 miles away, there's far more important things to be getting your knickers in a twist about than someone not asking his granny what he can call his kid. Did any of you consult your grandparents before naming your kids Precious Pumpkin, Wokey Wilma or Gammony Galahad? FFS, move on - these ****s don't give a **** about you so don't waste your energy on them, whichever side you want to take

 

If carlsberg did top rants

 

The serious answer is that the Queen isn't just someone's granny, she's probably the most famous person in the world (see what I did there?)

For as long as we have a royal family, their brand belongs to this country. There's huge value to it and being associated with it.

What Mercenary Meg and her avaricious advisors are doing, despite their contempt for the family, is using stuff like the Lilibet name to enhance their Sussex brand. Thicko Harry is being pulled along by his todger.