Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Hull City' started by Mr Bob, Mar 4, 2015.
Bit ****ing embarrasing wasn't it?
3000 kiddy fiddling advocates in the NE corner.
Disgraceful, reminds me of tws and the Savile chants.
I was disappointed we didn't sing 'That is Embarrassing' back at them.
Its worth remembering that the man hasn't been convicted of anything yet, so for our fans to chant peado was just as embarrassing, if not worse.
Having said that it would have been wise for Sunderland fans to keep quiet as if he does get convicted it will come back to haunt them.
They seem quite proud of themselves.
True. Innocent until proven guilty seems to be a decreasing concept in this country. And, as you said, chanting support of him is equally ill advised.
Would you expect anything less from them? I wouldn't.
Poor show from both sides chanting about this situation. Shows lack of class all round. They were proud enough to carry it on chanting over the bridge. Imagine how proud their mothers/sisters/nieces will be of them. It is innocent till proven guilty. However not sure how true that actually is given that people were chanting in favour of a convicted rapist not so long ago and on here I recall. So maybe it should be innocent till proven guilty and innocent if I think you are even though you've been convicted of a sex crime.
The situation was further provoked by the continual flashing up of the Sexual Exploitation advert on the screen.
innocent until proven guilty is negated by the idea of remand.
"He shags who he wants"
City rubbing the salt in ...
I wonder how they'll respond on the Slumderland board ...
To what? I don't think that story will even register on the Sunderland board and why would it?
Why should they be bothered?
It's an article about City players backing a campaign of a worthy cause. It had nothing to do with (a technically still innocent) Adam Johnson.
Not sure how that 'rubs salt in'.
Of course it has nowt to do with AJ. It's about sexual exploitation of children not sex with an underage girl. Only an idiot wouldn't know the difference.
Oh dear. He has no argument so goes for the old 'Haha, I was only fishing for bites' routine.
please log in to view this image
Think you've got a nibble? Go and look up the definition of exploitation, you'll fast feel an idiot
the action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work.
"the exploitation of migrant workers"
synonyms: taking advantage, making use, abuse of, misuse, ill treatment, unfair treatment, bleeding dry, sucking dry, squeezing, wringing; More
the action of making use of and benefiting from resources.
"the Bronze Age saw exploitation of gold deposits"
synonyms: utilization, utilizing, use, making use of, putting to use, making the most of, capitalization on; More
Are you accusing Adam Johnson or someone else off in some way profiting from sex with this girl in addition not knowing if he in fact did it or not? Or are you just going to admit to having a 'thick' moment and that your story has nothing to do with AJ or the reason he was arrested?
please log in to view this image
I'd agree with you, it's got nowt to do with AJ, but, if further down the line he is found guilty of sex with an underage girl, then he surely will have taken advantage of her no? By the definitions you've put up this would be exploitation, in this case sexual exploitation. Only a blinkered idiot would try to say there is a difference
Technically she will have equally taken advantage of him, as she knew it was against the law, whereas AJ didn't know she was underage.