I haven't quite defined it. It's a boundary if the ball touches the rope, and I should have said that. In fact, in this case, the ball is nowhere near the rope, and fielders aren't involved. It doesn't involve headgear or any paraphernalia do do with the players.
Hi. Yes it is Canterbury. The interesting part of the question is 'why was the act of the ball hitting the tree - a lime tee of many years standing - considered to be a boundary ?
Not that answer... but very interesting stuff here: https://www.paviliontales.com/the-shades-of-st-lawrence-lime/ Keeping looking
Until around 1910, a six was only credited to a batsman if the ball was hit out of the ground so it may well be that the tree was cleared before marked boundaries were introduced so... it was the first boundary marker in a way???
These laws may have been instigated pre-1910 where a Hampshire County Cricket Club batsman was claimed to be caught by a Kent County Cricket Club fielder off the tree.[3]
Yes. It was to avoid the situation where the ball ( I think ) was resting in the tree , and so could be claimed as a catch, by a fielder retrieving it that it was deemed to be a 4. (i.e. it had touched the ground!). I liked the picture - didn't know there was another ground like Canterbury. Anyway, over to you OFH.