Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by Northolt-QPR, Dec 18, 2011.
not only do you plague the Sunderland threads, you also wind up on the match threads started by QPR.
Did you watch the game or only looking at the stats? yes they had possession and more shots on target, but they were mostly restricted to long shots - they only had a few true goal scoring chances not much more than us - its just that they put one of theirs away.
Right....off to collect my younger son, do a bit of running around and then back for my eldest son and off to Loftus Road. Come on U RRRRRrrrrrrrrrrrrrrssss!!!!!!!
really looking forward to this game!! think this will be our second victory under o'niell but it's not gona be easy at all.....
ha'way ha'way ha'way
QPR 0 - Sunderland 3.
That is all.
No swearing on or off the field at Qpr pls, mackems.
And no singing either or you'll get reported by the qpr fans to the OB.
You've been warned
Come on Hammersmith, we only reported 1 useless Cnut in a Chelsea top that night, there were another 4,010 that we could have too.
Went for a fag a missed the goal. Any good?
good corner from Ricco, Bendtner took it well. But QPR made it easy.
Pah hope the R's improve second half as no composure on the ball where it matters. If only we had a skillful player with vision to break down the well drilled defence......
Did I or did I not say Bendy was great
NW really has to earn his money in the next 15 minutes we look very ordinary.
My god that was a poor half by us, credit to S'land who completely dominate us.
Quick goal in the second half would be a nice christmas present, only problem is we need it delivered by Santa himself!
Next PL goal will be #20.000, nice if it was us
Stupid goal, your always gonna concede if u dont follow your man, good finish though and fair play to sunderland they have dominated us all match (so far!)
Get the **** in!! Sesssssssssss
Hoooorrraaaaa! Get is Sess.
The goal was so good the ref can't take it.