When proven entirely wrong engage in logical fallacies. Or in layman's terms for the daft auld fanny; Dev proved you wrong and you cannae take it.
Except that Dev didn't prove him wrong. A ball coming at you at that speed can hardly be described as missing a sitter. Anyone who thinks it does has clearly never played the game.
That's a miss. You don't have the final say on what constitutes a "sitter" It's open to interpretation. Mongo.
^^Right out of the Mindy Fail Factory^^ "and he can't hit the target" mean he missed a "sitter". Away and take yer face furra ****e, ya zoob.
I've played football probably far more than you ever have, not at the standard Miller is currently playing but that was a sitter for a professional footballer.
It certainly wasn't a sitter, as somebody said, it was coming at him at speed, other days he would have scored it, all in all he had a good game, his movement and reading of the game was sharp I would say(apart from not reading the ball coming at him at speed, before any **** says) If he plays like that every week, I'll be happy.
Ok Rocket you win, it was'nt a sitter, it was a Glaring Miss from a well past his prime donkey. Happy now?
I've played football probably far more than you ever have, << a complete stab in the dark as you have no idea how much football I've played not at the standard Miller is currently playing << I'm stunned to learn that you don't have 69 international caps but that was a sitter for a professional footballer. << utter bollocks
A complete stab in the dark? And you have absolutely no idea how much football i've played do you? That didn't stop you making your comment that i've "clearly never played the game".