example of said nonsense if you please. There are some examples from this very thread. The likes of which can often be seen on more lowbrow football forums such as âFollow Followâ, a forum which you alone- amongst Rangers fans-have apparently never heard of (unless it was my cunning use of code in the form of âFFâ?). Please,point out where I mentioned âChargesâ and/or âConvictionsâ? Let me point out that you implied that Townshend was guilty of something, no? Why mention him then? An âexcuseâ? Sounds like you know better and are implying that what he said in his defence was an âexcuseâ? I know what âPerhapsâ means but you still implied that Townshend was guilty of something.......Perhaps? Look I said that you were âStereotypicalâ Is that not the same as me calling you a âStereotypeâ? Which dictionary ARE you using? And finally, I donât think you are really in a position to point out grammatical errors, do you? Honestly? Maybe you should try proofreading back to the start and see how many spelling errors you can spot? Did I say you called âmeâ childlike names? Again no, another misplaced assumption on your part, I was talking about your previous words aimed at HarryH. Given that your language there was all I had to go on I leapt to conclusions, correctly as it turns out. (Examples previously given above) You are all over the place, one minute talking about âSpewing Timmiesâ and the next you adopt the tired old routine of responding as if you were David Niven. Is it?
last season's players in... Kris Commons £300,000 Anthony Stokes £1.2 million Emilio Izaguirre £600,000 Beram Kayal £1.2 million Gary Hooper £2.4 million EfraÃn Juárez £3 million Daryl Murphy £800,000 total, £9.5 million! plus... Ki Sung-Yueng £2.1 million Scott Brown £4.4 million equals £16 million!!! Jelavic £3.5 million Lafferty £3.25 million your argument is totally flawed. you have at random picked some players celtic bought then chosen to only include two rangers players. but lets not get facts in the way when posting pish on an internet forum
you really are hard work, i started off thinking you were quite intelligent but as you keep coming back with the same rubbish i'm starting to think otherwise... spewing timmies etc was limited to one or two posts and that was a tongue in cheek retort to someone who speaks in a simillar fashion over-using words such as "hun" etc... yeah, looks that way... i can't even be bothered with you anymore, bored the arse off me and no doubt there will be another long winded reply going over the same points that i've explained several posts ago. and you have the cheek to use words such as regurgitated...
Maybe you should open your eyes, son. I said the entire team and quoted the teams on said occasion. "Losing's losing"
rangers (or the fans) have never actually claimed to have "nae dough" and you'll find that the celebratory T-shirts (it was 2 in a row btw, not 3!) were put together in jest towards the other football fans who themselves claimed that rangers had "nae dough". but i guess you already knew that...
I don't need Google, there is ample evidence of Rangers fans using that turn of phrase on this very forum. Use the search facility and look for "nae dough 3 in a row". Plenty of returns. And thanks to Nev for backing me up with Lafferty's photo above