1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Some thoughts on Farke

Discussion in 'Norwich City' started by GozoCanary, Jun 25, 2020.

  1. robbieBB

    robbieBB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Messages:
    5,006
    Likes Received:
    769
    Rick, all I'm asking people to do is look at those stats in the context of Farke's own statements about football and how he intends his team to play. This is a coach who wants his team to "have the ball" and "control" games by having it. What the stats say is that we fall well short on that measure, and do rather better when, either deliberately (e.g. against Man City H, Bournemouth A, Saturday's Cup tie) or having it forced on us by the opposition on the pitch (e.g. Arsenal H, Leicester H), we jettison "principle" and resort to what is basically a counter-attacking game.

    Looking into the possession stats in more detail just serves to reinforce what I'm saying. Take the games you refer to, in which "we went behind and then the other teams sat back to pick us off on the break". You are simply acknowledging that, while we set out to exert control through possession, we signally fail to do so. We may have a lot of possession, but we hardly ever have control of the game because of it (Newcastle H being the exception). Put bluntly, it's top six teams who can realistically aim to do what DF wants us to do. We simply aren't good enough, yet we persist in playing as if we are.

    Re. the Man City game, which you suggest should be discounted as a one-off. We didn't win it just because we scored with our only three shots on target. We won it because we played a classic counter-attacking game. Our clinical finishing wasn't the only outstanding feature of our play; the way we broke through Man City's high press with quick short passing up the flanks (orchestrated by Stiepermann) was a huge factor in the win and shows that setting up differently doesn't at all mean abandoning all the attractive elements of Farkeball and resorting to Pulisball. Going back to the stats though, even if you remove the Man City game and result, our points haul from games in which we have least possession is double that of games in which we have most.
     
    #41
  2. RiverEndRick

    RiverEndRick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    16,074
    Likes Received:
    8,232
    I agree with much of what you say, Robbie, and would have preferred us to use counterattacking far more because we have a squad well suited to it. Pukki scores most of his goals from counters and Cantwell, Onel and Buendia are well suited to it, as are Aarons, Lewis and Byram. I'd love to know whether DF intended to play 3 at the back in a 3-4-3 or similar formation, having hinted at it in the pre-season. That would have allowed more counterattacking tactics while also being stronger at the back. The failure to get a temporary replacement for Klose, given the injury problems at CB, put paid to that.
     
    #42
    robbieBB likes this.

Share This Page