The science behind RHCs liver thread

Yep.

 

Thought so

 

This was one of Sisu's:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...wards-450-000-Sandy-Hook-defamation-case.html

 

I miss sisu, some of the **** he come up with was amazing. Every now and again though hed post something that would make me have a little think and a wonder.

I do like an idea that challenges the way you think, however out Landish it may seem

 

What happened to him? Did he do a leaving thread?

 

I think he found the edge of the flat earth.

 

In Sisu's defence, I seem to remember he was spot on with the Palestinians plight.

He did PM me some weird **** when I disagreed on some other topic though

 

I don't need a crank who reckons that Sandy Hook was a government plot, and those parents are faking their grief, in order for me to constantly challenge any embedded preconceptions I may or may not have. Especially one who was completely unable to challenge his own ideas when they were utterly destroyed by fact and logic (except for the moon-landings: he did eventually back down after two months of having his ludicrous meme's, graphs and misinformation dismantled). Conspiracy theories have become a religion - the basic starting point now seems to be to believe unless disproved, as opposed to being sceptical to any idea unless supported by proof. Alt-right conspiracy theories are the new, 21st century religion : and Sisu and his ilk are the evangelist zealots of the cult.

 

He's not the only one to do that - Tobes, for instance, has banged the Palestinian drum longer than Sisu has been on here; Solid too, if memory serves. I don't remember those two conflating this genuine plight with an out-and-out trope of the world being run by the Rothschild's though, in some pernicious update of The Protocols Of The Elders Of Zion.

 

Up to a point. But people died in those shootings, and families grieve over lost children - to claim that they are paid liars is a shameful thing to do without cast-iron evidence, imo. Hearsay, suspicion born of paranoia, and misinterpretation of apparent loopholes in the official account is not enough under those circumstances.

 

I'll be honest, I dont remember him talking about sandy hook, but I did leave the site for quite awhile, maybe I just missed it.

I think I remember the moon landings that was good, I think I enjoyed reading some of the theories.

To be honest if I was after hard and fast scientific fact, I wouldn't be looking on a football forum. But I do enjoy a bit of lunacy.

 

I see what's happened there, sorry I didnt look at the link, probably not the best one to put my name to that says I missed his rants.

My apologies.

 

What better source is there?

 

Brietbart, apparently.

 

To be fair I've learnt some interesting things on here, quite a bit about snails strangely

 

Is that why you returned?

 

It was a big part, the suspense of not knowing how rhc got on at the bus stop with his snail was killing me.

 

Whilst being overtaken by a speeding harvester

 

See? Fast food again.