1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The var thread

Discussion in 'Southampton' started by Libby, Aug 6, 2019.

  1. Libby

    Libby 9-0

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    76,520
    Likes Received:
    77,291
    Did var look at that penalty shout for Burnley?
     
    #721
  2. Archers Road

    Archers Road Urban Spaceman

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    53,939
    Likes Received:
    58,522

    Then set fire to it
     
    #722
    Libby and ChilcoSaint like this.
  3. ----HistoryRepeating----

    ----HistoryRepeating---- Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    Messages:
    20,950
    Likes Received:
    9,664
    Then post it to Stockley Park with incorrect postage paid.
     
    #723
  4. ChilcoSaint

    ChilcoSaint What a disgrace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    37,344
    Likes Received:
    35,264
    Then put Stockley Park in self-isolation with no communication with the outside world for 3 months.
     
    #724
  5. St. Luigi Scrosoppi

    St. Luigi Scrosoppi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    11,751
    Likes Received:
    7,973
    VAR is just as unreliable as the referees going on current experience.

    I think the Premier League should put the refereeing of matches out to tender then we might get the contract awarded to an Italian or German refereeing association and we would have decent refs at last. We bring in foreign players and managers so why not foreign referees?
     
    #725
  6. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    62,539
    Likes Received:
    31,157
    Maybe because they're a bit busy refereeing in their own country.
     
    #726
  7. St. Luigi Scrosoppi

    St. Luigi Scrosoppi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2011
    Messages:
    11,751
    Likes Received:
    7,973
    Then they can have our referees.
     
    #727
    Archers Road likes this.
  8. saintrichie123

    saintrichie123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    30,065
    Likes Received:
    34,751
  9. ChilcoSaint

    ChilcoSaint What a disgrace
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    37,344
    Likes Received:
    35,264
    Thanks, I looked back several pages but you must have already bumped it!
     
    #729
    saintrichie123 and Saints FC 76 like this.
  10. Saints FC 76

    Saints FC 76 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2011
    Messages:
    2,206
    Likes Received:
    1,776
    Thanks mate. @Libby this is what I originally posted to you about VAR, as I know you love the topic:

    I just wanted to wade in really and say that I was originally always for VAR, but that's because I always thought it would improve after last season's mess. Maybe it still will in time, but I changed my mind this season when I didn't celebrate Walcott's goal at Wolves. I presumed Armstrong fouled their defender in the build up and was convinced it would be ruled out.

    Problem is I think we have to accept that it just won't be scrapped, regardless of how loud pundits or fans shout. That means we have to live with it.

    So the way forward is for them to make it less ****. Maybe it would help if they had a 30 second time limit, using no lines on the screen, and if they can't make a decision in that time with the naked eye then the on-field decision stands. The issue with that is that there will still be that element of doubt with a lot of goals and the majority of decisions that the ref makes will still be scrutinised by VAR.

    I think the only way you can keep VAR and reintroduce the passion of celebrating goals is to have 3 reviews per side per game. The time limit I mentioned above still applies and unless the review shows an error, the ref's original decision is final.

    Still not ideal by any means but it would at least take away the mess they're making of it now (IMO).
     
    #730
    Libby likes this.

  11. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    If you go back to the Roman times you’ll read an inscription from me saying that we should use the technology but not as a circus and give a 10 second review time. Let the game play on if the ball hasn’t gone dead, ditch the screens, ditch the monitor and have a referee in a box or studio connected to the referee and tell him he missed an obvious one. Nobody sees or hears anything. Check a penalty or an offside or a goal. Nothing else. Make the change if needed because it was an obvious **** up and if within ten seconds the game will hardly be affected. Longer than 10
    Seconds then it isn’t an obvious errors and stick with original decision. Game will improve but won’t be perfection.

    10 seconds

    It’s becoming my new 6 games
     
    #731
  12. saintrichie123

    saintrichie123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    30,065
    Likes Received:
    34,751
  13. saintrichie123

    saintrichie123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    30,065
    Likes Received:
    34,751
  14. fatletiss

    fatletiss Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2011
    Messages:
    57,300
    Likes Received:
    40,066
    I don’t want to like those images Richie.. that’s sacrilege
     
    #734
  15. saintrichie123

    saintrichie123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    30,065
    Likes Received:
    34,751
    :emoticon-0110-tongu
     
    #735
  16. saintrichie123

    saintrichie123 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2011
    Messages:
    30,065
    Likes Received:
    34,751
  17. Libby

    Libby 9-0

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    76,520
    Likes Received:
    77,291
    It's almost as if I was right all along.

    95% of those surveyed said they feel it's ruined the spontaneity of goal celebrations. I remember being told on here that I was talking nonsense when I said that <laugh>
     
    #737
    davecg69 likes this.
  18. tomw24

    tomw24 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    62,539
    Likes Received:
    31,157
    Thicker lines are to be used by VAR for offside decisions next season. Apparently this is done in Holland and has been a lot less controversial so we shall see what happens.
     
    #738
  19. StJabbo1

    StJabbo1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2019
    Messages:
    8,418
    Likes Received:
    10,054
    Thick lines in Holland not to be sniffed at.
     
    #739

Share This Page