We'll find out in due course if Old Rangers cheated or not, i'm sure any wrongdoing will come out in the wash now that BDO are on the case. The definition of cheating will - I suspect - be argued over though.
so if you are the same rangers do you agree then that you should face the punishments if and when the dual contracts investigation? Do you agree that you should be punished from the appellate tribunal for bringing the game into disrepute? Or do you think that as you are a newco these things rest with the old rangers ?
Rough with the smooth, If we're getting called a newco with no history then the transfer embargo and ebt's or gone too...
it's not that you are getting called a newco. you are a newco. as a result i agree that any punishments for the old rangers should be placed on the old rangers. The only punishment in my opinion you should face is if you wish to go straight back into the spl. if you go into division 3 then no sanctions should be put in place. Do you think tho that the spl / sfa will not punish new rangers for the sins of old rangers?
If the SPL or the SFA inflict any further punishment on the newco then it means they are treating it as old rangers so we still have our history.
Have your 54 tainted title ,in the end of day when Hmrc and the bank came calling they were meaningless . Every title and cup Rangers have won your memory of that day is totally tarnished because you cheated .Your name throughout the world of football is mud and can never be recovered .
No it doesn't, if a newco gets admitted straight into the SPL that will be against the normal rules of teams having to get promoted to play in the top tier - if you want to be shown favouritism (it does seem to be part of your DNA after all) then you need to accept the consequences of not going through the usual route and earning your place at the big table
And if they inflict no punishments (they haven't actually punished Rangers yet) then Rangers no longer exist and the history is scrubbed? Seems fair.
In your wet dreams sunshine, at best it's 54+0 - 43... Where are you getting that from?!?! No it's not you mudslinging, slavering gob****e of a man. Celtics name was mud when they were exposed for fiddling wi bairns, people will forget about us fiddling taxes too in time... You still haven't replied you ****ebag ps. No "newco's" yet!...
Well you's obviously care otherwise you's wouldn't be obsessed with the "no history" and "no stars" pish even though you's claim wining a cup nearly 50 years ago is a better. Well if so, why so obsessed?... Ps. Your history isn't exactly squeaky clean?... There was plans in place to secure the history and you know what I meant you pedant. And we're not even a newco yet so just pipe down son.
Since Nev's missing today, I'll dae it... Chapper's re-occurring apostrophe palaver. I think I know how these go now #ahem# A brief guide to posting like a beeling hun. ...and following a question mark with an ellipsis? Really?...
"Look at your own mob sunshine! How long do you think this will be dragged up for? Especially if they're voted back into spl" que?