But like I said, every action on those machines, every instruction, every change, is logged. It would be stupid to do as it would be evident on the machines.
From what I understand, the suspicious activity is entirely on the part of the Democrats. Also, all of the tens of thousands of votes that came in over night were entirely in Biden's favour. I am not a supporter of Trump or Biden, and I have no vested interest in which of them wins the election. But, to me, that is highly suspicious.
It may well be the case that Trump's legal team has got access to the necessary records and files. In one interview that I watched today, one of the lawyers was extremely upbeat about the damning nature of the evidence she had.
That's not true though mate. Plenty of States which had already called in favour of Trump stopped counting over night. They resumed counting the next day. Many of those were Republican. All I asked was how many were Republican?
I have no idea. However, I have absolutely no doubt that if there were any irregularities the anti-Trump MSM hate-machine would have jumped all over it.
Taking away post boxes and surrounding the ones left with your armed supporters,I'd call that a form of vote rigging.
Every accusation so far, from spikes in Biden votes to dead voters to republicans not being allowed to watch has been utterly shat on. This has been debunked about 30 times FFS.
That bollocks was debunked 10 days ago, keep up ffs. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/fairfax-gave-biden-extra-votes/
That is not true, both of them gained more votes via post, but more of them were from areas, where Democrats have always been strong, so Joe's lead increased.
Well, let's see where we are after the next round of legal challenges. Ultimately, all anyone can reasonably ask is that any valid evidence is given a fair and full hearing. That's what happens in a democratic society.
Not just post boxes. Trump supporters were filmed live on TV rocking up at polling stations heavily armed in order to intimidate. Obviously most of America is backwards so it's not illegal.
Why would they if it's regular procedure for many States to stop counting? That doesn't mean irregularity. Look at this way. Most States (if not all), as regular practice stop counting at some point overnight. Some States have counted enough percentage at that point to project the winner, others have not. The ones who haven't get put in the spotlight as some sort of irregularity, when the truth is the only difference was they didn't reach enough to project the winner at that point because the vote was too close. Everything in respect of the vote in those States supports that. What you're suggesting is that States should not stop counting until they reach a percentage where they are able to project a winner?
