US Election

Oh you are invested. You have claimed voter fraud, rigged elections and that it has only been done by democrats.
You avoid the defunding of the USPS, voter intimidation etc.

but yeah, you are not invested in this. What’s your next outsider crusade? The one where it’s you against MSM and the people who are easily fooled?

 

I don't bookmark anything.

I prefer to mookbark instead. The ability to instantly forget what someone has posted and to never make any effort to bring it up again.

 

profiteer? It’s a charitable bet! Meaning you put £50 to a charity of Archer’s choice and vice versa.

 

Yeah, that’s probably what’s happening here. You deluded balloon

 

@Spurlock see, Bruv. Lashing out in all directions.

 

You also bottled an avatar bet on the same issue - from me.

Despite being adamant that you were going to be proven right.

 

I know.

But I would not want to taint any donation with something so obscene.

This is democracy and the freedom of the people to determine their own elections that we are talking about, here.

I think what we all need to do is stay calm and focussed, and await the outcome of litany of heavyweight litigation what is about to hit the courts.

 

I'm appealing for calm and focus, Tobias.

There is no need for people to get ultra defensive on this issue and to lash out with wagers and other passive-aggressive tactics.

None of us should be so heavily invested in either candidate that we do not lose sight of what is at stake.

 

For anyone who may have missed it, here’s ^ HIAG proclaiming his love for Trump.

Not that he’s bothered or anything.

 

So in other words even you know you are talking bollocks and just too embarrassed you've made a total arse out of yourself







Again

 

I do not see how you could have arrived at that conclusion from anything I have written on this subject, especially when I have made it abundantly clear that my opinion is (a) there is evidence of vote rigging, and (b) that it must be put before the Supreme Court to be tested.

I have made no pronouncement on the strength of the evidence or made any prediction that it will be sufficient to determine the result of the election.

 

So you are accepting that it's a pretty much given that Trump has lost and any of the cases he is bringing forward make **** all difference?

 

Absolutely not.

If Sydney Powell can prove half of what she alleges - and she appears to be extremely confident that she can - not only will Trump be shown to have won by a landslide, but some prominent names could be looking at long prison sentences.

 

So you believe what she is saying has happened? Do you believe that not only did Trump win, but by a landslide? Good luck with that

 

Donald is facing 6 separate lawsuits now that his Presidency has ended ...

1 Hush money to women he had affairs with

2 Tax and bank fraud

3 Real estate fraud

4 Emoluments

5 Sexual misconduct lawsuits

6 Mary Trump - his niece

He's in deep doo doo

 

No but he won't lose, the fraud cases will be proven and he will win by a landslide

 

Comprehension is something that you appear to struggle with.

How many times do I have to state that the evidence has to be tested by the court?

Anyone making a pronouncement on the result is foolish.

What I have said is that IF Trump's legal team is able to prove even half what Sydney Powell has asserted, the election has to go to Trump.

 

Wrong thread

 

So what?

China Joe is likely to be impeached for his clear collision with China, Russia, and other countries, whether or not he wins the election.

What has any of that to do with the evidence for vote rigging?

 

So do you believe what Powell is putting forward? Do you believe there is fraud on a scale that would have seen Trump win by a landslide?

Simple yes or no will do