Yes = Page_Moss_Kopite, luvgonzo, Flappy Flanagan (JK), RogerisontheHunt, Redreggy and Milk Can No = Jimmy Squarefoot, Dan Starkey, afcftw, organic red, astroturfnaut, Tobes and Stan Undecided = Lamborini and Dirtyfrank MITO is a c*nt = Gerrez
Although I'm usually a supporter of that option it feels wrong voting for that when MITO isn't here. Its not banter if he's not here to see it.
Where is MITO? How come he's disappeared? On a cheap off peak holiday? Too much porn and his ISP has disconnected him?
I'm sure they sanctioned £20m on Lovren, £25m Lallana, £32.5m Benteke - 3 mid table players. Blame the man who a) signed them, and b) the men who gave the other man the authority.
So the 'No' are opposition fans, Jimmy who voted for it for a laugh, Organic who is seemingly the most patient person in the world and Astro Sums it up really.
Yep, basically everyone but me is a moron. What does sacking Rodgers right now achieve? We don't even have an established coaching setup to take over while you scramble around for a replacement.
So which is it? A committee with collective responsibility or two camps Brod v the others never really agreeing? That's my point. It's a system that allows people to lay the blame where they want to. Either the whole committee is to blame (including Rodgers) or its not. If the committee can and has, as a body, vetoed players Rodgers wanted then they agreed to all the players we have because they didn't veto them. This 'his man" or "committee man" is nonsense.