Can't speak for the others, but can you point me to where I have defended Suarez's actions? I agree with Tobes and others that he's in for a tidal wave of ****, and he has it coming. However, as I've pointed out consistently, and will keep doing so again, for all the opportunistic self-righteous divs whose main concern is **** all to do with 'the game of football' or 'Shankly turning in his grave', unless FIFA retrospectively re-writes its own codes and punishments to sate these self-serving, faux outrages, the bans and sanctions (maximum 24 month, 12 games?) applies to international football. There is no precedent for on-field infringements to be dealt with otherwise, though had Suarez punched a ref or raped a lino (and don't ****ing rule it out) I'm sure that FIFA would have the powers for a blanket ban.
Otherwise, it's a physical assault on another player in the field of play, and should FIFA try to expand that to other perspectives in order to sate the bloodlust of the English media and pious football fans they'd face undoubted legal action from the player and his national administration. Luis is not the victim in this incident, but retrospectively changing the rules and punishments to suit sports' columnists from the Mail and the Mirror will make him so.
Besides which, you all get your wishes (if that's really what they are) in that Liverpool will almost certainly have to have to sell, under-priced, sooner or later as the FA will be watching and waiting for the next indiscretion like old ladies knitting around the tumbrils at the guillotine. And sure as ****, Luis will do something again, and the next one - if in England - will be a long/lifetime ban. What you won't get is the lifetime ban and Liverpool lose all their money and you'll never have to face Suarez again that you want now for something that happened in an international game, and are dressing-up in some pious, self-serving morally outraged shock.