After that post? Go **** yourself you delusional ****And when BRB does confirm it, will you make a full and unequivocal apology for being a complete idiot and twat?

After that post? Go **** yourself you delusional ****And when BRB does confirm it, will you make a full and unequivocal apology for being a complete idiot and twat?

I think we both know the answer to that one, mate.

Now you are just lying, one hour photo
Proof please
... to me ... to you ... the Chuckle brother has himself well in hand![]()

Whether the sock is right or wrong, he's still a monumental bell end
You are looking for proof that you have outright stated or heavily implied me and Hiag are the same person ?
**** off, you and everyone else knows full well you always say it.
That sounds like the HIAG account talking mateThat's the hurt pride talking, mate
If you can remember beyond today, I was the one who told Fosse he was barking up the wrong tree with the accusation
However, in the last few days I doubted my own judgement and today told Fosse I thought I was wrong and he was right.
I listed my reasoning earlier
I'm a man HIAG, and if I'm proven to be wrong then I'll apologise to both you and Saints if I've falsely accused you, not a problem. However, the 'evidence' provided isn't evidence, and the supplier has an issue with me, so I'm not accepting that it's reliable as proof, as it isn't, simple as.
However, what I will do, is not make any further accusations, as there's now sufficient doubt for me to think my initial conclusion was possibly the correct one......
Whether the sock is right or wrong, he's still a monumental bell end

I've never said that HIAG/Saints are the same person...
Calm down, show me the proof where I have said that you and HIAG are the same person.
I've said that you are each other's alter ego. And I've likened you to the HIAB/SIAB character because you are both objects of ridicule.
I wasn't referring to Saints mateTo be fair, I'd want to distance myself from HIAG to if somebody was comparing us to each other![]()

Fair play to you Tobes ... whilst I still can't fathom any plausible reason for Saints existence on the forum other than a HIAG facade I wont allude to the symbiosis againIf you can remember beyond today, I was the one who told Fosse he was barking up the wrong tree with the accusation
However, in the last few days I doubted my own judgement and today told Fosse I thought I was wrong and he was right.
I listed my reasoning earlier
I'm a man HIAG, and if I'm proven to be wrong then I'll apologise to both you and Saints if I've falsely accused you, not a problem. However, the 'evidence' provided isn't evidence, and the supplier has an issue with me, so I'm not accepting that it's reliable as proof, as it isn't, simple as.
However, what I will do, is not make any further accusations, as there's now sufficient doubt for me to think my intial conclusion was possibly the correct one......
Christ all the ladyboys in Bangkok won't be able to console skiddy after this



Piskie I think deep down always knew me and Hiag weren't the same but of course he went along with it to have a pop at Hiag, same is probably true of Fosse
Skiddy was convinced![]()
You've only been a member for a year or so in fairness mate....Piskie, this has to be the most extraordinary backtracking ever witnessed on this site
Are you really saying that you have never stated that me and HIAG are the same poster ? If so I almost pity you, we all know people who cannot admit that they are wrong but this would have to be at the most extreme case ever witnessed
That's because Skiddy was too busy screaming at people on the bus and forgot to actually think about anything.
Piskie, this has to be the most extraordinary backtracking ever witnessed on this site
Are you really saying that you have never stated that me and HIAG are the same poster ? If so I almost pity you, we all know people who cannot admit that they are wrong but this would have to be at the most extreme case ever witnessed
