Surprised this hasn't been mentioned before now, but on Saturday it was announced the club would be the only Championship club not offering any form of streaming service for International supporters due to the expense and the low expected take up.
Yet further and further buries the bullshit about manoeuvring us to become an international brand and re-emphasises the sheer spiteful intentions of the continued Tigers rebrand.
Do they not have to either provide a stream themselves or signup to iFollow, i didn't think **** the fans was an option (mind you I should have!) Do you know if you can sign up to iFollow for another team and just watch the "away stream" like you could with TigerPlayer?
Not sure about that. What with the ban watching games broadcast live by Sky, and a number of Championship clubs having their own TV service (Leeds, Villa), may miss out on a few games.
I've just found this on their FAQ Q: Will iFollow subscribers be able to access all of the EFL games being shown live, even for clubs they don’t support? A: No. Subscribers will only be able to watch live and on-demand streams of the subscriptions that they subscribe to. So, for example, if you subscribe to iFollow Millwall, you’ll get to see all of the home and away matches of Millwall FC. Looks like we may be **** out of luck!
Some have a pay per view option which is a decent option, for example if our leeds games aren't televised I can still watch those.
There was a period where he'd come on around 11am-12pm my time and just pick at something I'd said and create back and forth discussions that people didn't like when they then logged on so I figured the easiest way to stop it was to just ignore.
In my defence: Quote SydneyTiger14: (his response to you post). "There was a period where he'd come on around 11am-12pm my time and just pick at something I'd said and create back and forth discussions that people didn't like when they then logged on so I figured the easiest way to stop it was to just ignore." A jumped-up know-it-all, who constantly prolongs conversations because he disagrees with others opinions, and is intent on having the last word. It appears he is developing a "Mother Theresa/Florence Nightingale" syndrome now to save the world - see quote above. He had no-one else to talk to at the times quoted and objected to my questioning his logic or statements. I may not be the only one with this opinion.
I think you were spot on in your questioning of syd at that time tc. But I'll say syd has changed a hell of a lot and is a good poster now.
I tend to agree with your last sentence Chazz, but it irks me when he doesn't look in the mirror and blames others for prolonged conversations that he essentially propagates. There's still an element of that obviously given his most recent post - he's not blameless, but I suppose I should ignore the characteristic to prevent slanging matches.