Off Topic European Debate Thread

There is far right and there is the extreme far right, you wont find any extreme far right politicians leading any party in Europe.......UKIP is nothing more than a racist party no matter how they try to deny it....Their views are total bollox and their leader who was thrown out of the Tory party years ago.

 

You did not answer the question.

The destiny of the UK should be up to the populace of this Country, including its governance.

Tony Benn favoured leaving the EU. Mr Benn was leftfield. I also do not consider Mr Benn to have been a tosser.

 

Think before you vote......Are you voting yourself out of a job and you don't realize it? You don't have to work for a European company to have your job under threat.!
If your company has dealings with any country in the EU then if we leave it will be more expensive to do any trade from the outside and again put jobs in jeopardy as firms will have to make up the money they lose in profits and that's why companies in this country who do a lot of trade in Europe are urging people to vote to stay in.
People who are voting out are voting out with the idea that we can run ourselves, Well yes we can run ourselves but in a more expensive way and with no protection from anywhere. Without carefully understanding the consequences of what leaving the EU umbrella means and all the benefits we get from working with our partners then you could be voting for a life of misery and struggle as this country sinks into deep recession like never before....

 

You still have not answered the question regarding democracy.

That is a complete misnomer. Being a member of the EU also can make trading more expensive. A point made by Peter Hargreaves, a man who does more than a bit of trade with everywhere.

You post is rambling. Its regurgitating project fear, but even Osbourne does not go this far "then you could be voting for a life of misery and struggle as this country sinks into deep recession like never before".

 

Boris Johnson is like Donald trump. Only less extreme and only because the British are less far right than the Republicans

 

You do realise that Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Raygun shared the same political philosophy!

 

Whichever way we look at it, this isn't sustainable.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36382199

 

I rest my case......

 

Which is?

The present PM is indulging in a form of disaster capitalism where the welfare state is attacked. Thatcher would drool over it.

 

Thatcher destroyed the north and Wales and Scotland where some of us have still not recovered from and if it was not for us being in the EU we would be a lot worse off than we are......Thatcher was an evil woman who targeted the labour areas and took their jobs away leaving the Tory areas to flourish that caused the biggest North /South divide that still exists today......It took members of her own party who were not right wing to get rid of the witch. Thank god we had the EU to fall back on.

 

The EU has helped to destroy industry as well. By adhering to EU regulation industries such as steel have become uncompetitive and ... Well Britain barely has a steel industry anymore.

The road Thatcher set on privatising anything and everything also can occur with the UK being within the EU. Legislation/trade deals (ha!) being considered could lead to Governments being sued by corporations, and Countries having to sell assets.

Leaving the EU would allow Governments more ability to go down a protectionist route to ring fence British jobs, industry and services. It would also be easier (in theory) to renationalise utilities.

Ding Dong (Thatcher) indeed was a dark creature. However she was removed, Governments change left to right, but we as a populace have little ability to vote against the EU policies.

 

And increasing and with bugger all control over it. Madness!!!

 

BULLSHIT

The only way to compete with China (steel wise) is for the Eu to make a stand and restrict Chinese imports within the Eu.

Energy costs and labour costs are largely to blame for price differences as well as quality.

Eu regulations could mean that steel has to be of a quality produced in the UK and across Europe.

Mind you without the Eu perhaps we could exploit workers and not have to worry about health and safety and the environment or the quality of steel produced. Then we may be competitive.

 

Complete rubbish yet again, we've been in the EU for 40 years and it's done nothing to save Llanwern or the ones up North and with Port Talbot being the last one to go.
Energy cost are also set by tariffs set by Eu.
We lead the way, and it's been pointed out to you time and time again in health and safety. It's the others countries that don't.
Once again you've made a rash statement without thinking it through. Stop thinking you know everything at 18 and arguing with people that's been grown up and diplomatic throughout.

 

Using the caps lock does not make green costs bullshit.

Another way to compete with China is to compensate UK producers. The hurdle is there that the EU has rules to make that problematic.

 

In MTG's defence, I would imagine there is some truth in Chinese imports being cheaper due to exploitation and poorer quality, which being part of the EU can help to resolve.

 

What a load of old bollocks.. You will be voting for a life of misery and struggle and giving all your money to unelected bureaucrats in Brussels if you vote stay..

Nothing like a bit of scaremongering.. thats all the 'stay' have left.!!

 

It was his attack on the poster, that riled me. After last weeks fiasco I've tried to reign him in when he gets on his mission to try and argue his point.
However he was saying to stay in to protect the steel industry. We've been in the EU now for years and years and all the steelworks have all shut.
If the Chinese product is poorer then surely the EU should only trade steel with better quality steel. Hence they don't so using that as an excuse is rubbish.
A lot of things in this country have to buy sustainability, trust me a pain in the arse setting up concrete mixes with recycled product. The biggest by product to be used in concrete is blast furnace slag, which we won't get in the future with steel manufacturing stopping. All this is to try to buy recycled or local to reduce co2 emissions on manufacturing. Buying and shipping from China can't really compete with that.
Perhaps if we come out we can then support our own products without the EU trade aggrement flaunting rules when it suits.

 

Just done my postal vote ❎

Thought it was easier than on the day as have got my last 4 exams in the next 4 days after the referendum.

Can you guess which way I voted

 

The only way to compete with China (steel wise) is for the Eu to make a stand and restrict Chinese imports within the Eu.

This was his point. It is incorrect. A way of competing with China would be to deregulate and subsidise.

The thought of Britain asking the EU to block Chinese importation is uneven. The Conservatives have gone to great lengths to make China one of the UK's biggest trading partners. It is not a good nation to start a trade war with!!