Jak to Fulham?

Harsh criticism; his opportunity has been limited.

Do you really judge a player on the basis of what is spent on another? Really? Under the stewardship of Ehaw and MP? Not your wisest moment.

 

Because no one's judging Pogba based on a silly fee? It's always going to happen.

My point wasn't so much to judge Marshall, but to suggest we could have spent a fraction to buy someone to be back up to Jak while McGregor recovered, and spent the money on full backs instead.

 

I think this is a better take on the situation.

 

Bloody good post.

 

I'm still catching up and you're still with that one trick, a pretty poor one at that.

 

So, perhaps, there was a strong argument for staying with the in form GK? You were very strong in arguing differently at the time.

 

Bollocks.

 

Another bloody good post on this football thread - hallelujah!

 

Nobody has, nobody is, except you, apparently.

 

That would be Pogba being judged on the fee paid for Pogba, then? Try reading what I wrote and see if you are addressing the correct point or not.

 

Ah my mistake. I'm not quite sure what you mean then. I'm judging Marshall based on how much we paid, and Kuciak based on how he's performed and the expectations of the club not being met.

 

Weird **** this year, for years we had no goalie, now we have **** loads & can't decide who's good, who's bad & who's genuinely ****e!

 

When all fit, for me McGregor is third choice.

 

And Jakupovic first choice.

 

It would be unwise to drop after his performance. Same with the front two.
Henandez almost scored the goal of the season.

 

But it'd be wise to drop Marshall after his performance against Stoke?

 

At last you say something sensible about the bloody daft quandary MP has put himslf in by dropping the in-form GK for no good reason. I agree, it makes no sense, nor is it wise, except that, on balance, Jak has been the better GK, statiscally, athletically and inspirationally (fans and players) ...

... Until he has a bad game, in the normal way of things.

 

Goalkeepers sometimes make great saves. They're called 'great saves' because you wouldn't normally expect them to save such and such a shot. When they don't make that great save, nobody blames them. That's all as it should be.

But sometimes keepers make 'great saves'.

Jak's made loads of them for us.

Marshall hasn't. It's correct to say none of the 87 goals he's conceded since he came here were his fault.

But when is he going to make a 'great save'?