just used the term "Cattermoled" to sky!! ****er!! Referring to A trip by Catts on Berahino on Saturday. It was next to nothing and Pulis uses that term.... Think the term should be "Pulis'd" as he played the whole game!! If he was injured YOU SHOULD SUB HIM ****WIT
If that's true, he's opened himself up to a charge from the FA. Cattermole should laugh it off but his agent should go ****ing ballistic and raise holy hell!! And so should SAFC!!!!
Wasn't it a WBA player that should have been sent off, us that should have had a penalty and us that should upset at having a good goal disallowed. Pulis always moans about Catts. Was he still at Stoke when they nearly signed him? Legal eagles doesn't that amount to libel?
The sad thing is that mud sticks, and despite Catts being extremely well behaved of late, he is still getting booked for next to nowt most games..
Yes,RAW,mud does stick,and because of his comment,Pulis should get done by FA officals for bringing the game into disrepute......wuffing fanker that he is!!!
Pulis is a bitter ****, applied for the position at safc many times and failed, he would love catts in his midfield, tbf i watched the interview and it seemed like a slip if the tongue which the reporter jumped on, pulis didnt let it go though, cap wearing never will be
To be honest I think Pullis is a pretty decent manager, but he does come out with some ****ty excuses of Wenger proportions at times..
I like Pulis and think he is a decent manager on or around our level, but this was a character attack and should not be laughed off, he should be charged by the FA no question.
Let's see what poyet has to say about it. Pulls should have a word with his soft **** players for going down all the time.
I like Pulis, but he has no right to go on Sky and talk about our player like he is some sort of embodiment of all that is evil in the game, especially when his team are in the same relegation fight as SAFC. That is not right!!!
Anyone who calls Lee Cattermole after managing one of the most physical sides in Prem history is asking for a poke in the eye IMHO...