I believe the offences he has been convicted of only allow for a 10% reduction and good behaviour isn't assessed, so it should be at least 5 1/2 years
To play devil's advocate and taking the emotion out of things, why should he have got more? Seems very much in proportion or harsher than similar offences in the past. Six years is a bloody long time.
Harsh imo. should he of known better, yes. Has he done wrong, yes. But to label hIm a peado/nonce , a term I think applies to kiddie fiddlers is a bit ott. I think he's been made an example of because of who he is. Real peados get a lot less for a lot worse.
Agreed but we did all this in the last thread. As with so many issues on here, both footballing and non footballing, the views held are often diametrically opposite and deeply entrenched. No one changes their mind!
he knew what he was doing, she was just a child. He earnt another 3 mill whilst lying to his employer before changing his plea at last minute thinking he would get away with it. Wonder how the innocent child in all this feels. Johnson should have known better. Wonder how he would feel if his offspring suffers the same thing his victim got. 6 years for me is not long enough.
Yes, obviously, but it's completely irrelevant when considering what a fair punishment is for the crime.
Watford - we may not agree with my earlier comment - however, the victim and the impact of these events on her life appears to have been forgotten in all this. Johnson got off lightly, although considering what sentences Rolf Harris and Stuart Hall received it would appear to be a "normal custodial sentence" whether I agree with it or not.