1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Off Topic All new conspiracy thread

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by kiwiqpr, Aug 4, 2021.

  1. UTRs

    UTRs Senile Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Messages:
    33,578
    Likes Received:
    71,661
    Morning Kiwi<cheers>
     
    #81
    kiwiqpr likes this.
  2. UTRs

    UTRs Senile Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2013
    Messages:
    33,578
    Likes Received:
    71,661
     
    #82
    Steelmonkey and kiwiqpr like this.
  3. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    evening utrs
    are you thrilled about gwyneth coming to see her ex at loftus rd

    she might bring some candles
     
    #83
    UTRs, Steelmonkey and Wherever like this.
  4. Wherever

    Wherever Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2012
    Messages:
    26,271
    Likes Received:
    75,903
    Or not wash after a gym session
     
    #84
    kiwiqpr likes this.
  5. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    please log in to view this image
     
    #85
    Steelmonkey likes this.
  6. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    Aaron Rodgers Is Floating Conspiracy Theories About the U.S. Downing UFOs
    The four-time NFL MVP has joined the brigade of right-wing trolls who believe the news around the spate of high-altitude objects is meant to distract the public
    BY RYAN BORT


    FEBRUARY 14, 2023
    please log in to view this image

    Aaron Rodgers at Lambeau Field on Jan. 1, 2023 in Green Bay, Wisconsin. STACY REVERE/GETTY IMAGES
    AARON RODGERS, QUARTERBACK of the Green Bay Packers, is no stranger to right-wing talking points. He’s a proud anti-vaxxer and has railed against the “woke mob” coming to “cancel” him, all while insisting he’s not a conspiracy theorist — only a “free thinker.”

    Rodgers has apparently been thinking freely about the spate of high-altitude objects the U.S. has downed over the past week, too. The four-time NFL MVP floated on The Pat McAfee Show on Tuesday that the hubbub surrounding the UFOs is a manufactured ploy to distract the public.

    “It’s interesting timing on everything,” Rodgers said. “There’s a lot of other things going on in the world.”

    McAfee prodded Rodgers for more. Rodgers obliged him, sarcastically claiming the government would never try to misdirect the nation’s attention. McAfee mentioned the train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio. “There’s some wild **** going on right now, Aaron,” he said.

    Rodgers agreed. “Did you hear about the Epstein client list about to be released?” he said. “There’s some files that have some names on them that might be getting released pretty soon. [Ghislaine] Maxwell was the only person ever convicted of trafficking and nobody who was involved in the trafficking ever went to jail. Nothing to see here.”



    Rodgers is far from the only “free thinker” to suggest the U.S. may have ulterior motives in shooting down three UFOs in as many days.

    The right-wing pundit class has been pushing the idea that the government wants to divert attention from the train derailment in East Palestine. “Ohio: Dead fish and cattle being reported as far as 100 miles away from the site. Journalists covering the story have been arrested. What the HELL is going on?” wrote far-right conspiracy theorist Stew Peters in a tweet that has been shared well over 100,000 times since he posted it on Monday. Peters added on Tuesday that the “fake Balloon fiasco is a red herring.”

    TRENDING
    Trump Plans to Bring Back Firing Squads, Group Executions if He Retakes White House
    ‘Get Used to It’: Bella Ramsey Rebuffs ‘Last of Us’ Culture War Backlash
    Tina Fey and Amy Poehler Announce Their First Live Tour!
    Gunman Found Dead; 3 Killed, 5 Wounded in Michigan State Campus Shooting


    Republican politicians have also tried to make hay out of the fact that two news cycles are happening simultaneously. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) tweeted on Sunday that it’s all a distraction from the train derailment in East Palestine. “East Palestine, Ohio is undergoing an ecological disaster bc authorities blew up the train derailment cars carrying hazardous chemicals and press are being arrested for trying to tell the story,” she wrote. “Oh but UFO’s! What is going on?”

    Rodgers has had plenty of time to entertain conspiracy theories since the Packers were eliminated from playoff contention last month. Many have speculated he could start the 2023 season on a different team, possibly the New York Jets, who have already asked the Packers if there’s a way they can acquire him. Rodgers told McAfee last week that he’s going to sort out his plans for the future on a darkness retreat.
     
    #86
  7. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    People will forgive you for being wrong, but they will never forgive you for being right—especially if events prove you right while proving them wrong.
     
    #87
    UTRs likes this.
  8. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  9. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  10. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363

  11. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  12. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  13. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    where is butthuber

     
    #93
  14. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  15. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    Conspiracy theorists led family to death in Switzerland
    • Published
      3 hours ago
    Share
    please log in to view this image
    IMAGE SOURCE,GETTY IMAGES
    Image caption,
    The family had moved to Switzerland from France two years before the tragedy
    By Imogen Foulkes
    BBC Geneva correspondent

    Adults in a family who led their family to their deaths in Switzerland planned the event, Swiss investigators say.

    The case, which shocked Switzerland, will now be closed.

    Police have ruled out any outside intervention, and say the adults, who moved to Switzerland from France two years earlier, gave no sign they were considering suicide.

    Four of the family died on 24 March last year in Montreux.


    An eight-year-old girl, a 15-year-old boy, their father and mother, and the mother's twin sister fell from their seventh floor apartment.

    The boy was in a coma but has now recovered from his serious injuries. He has no memory of that day, investigators say.


    Forensic evidence revealed no sign of a struggle before the deaths, and autopsies showed no trace of drugs.

    After a year of investigation, the Swiss authorities now say the mother of the family, and her sister, were deeply involved in survivalist and conspiracy theories.

    After the deaths, police found their apartment full of food, medicines, and hygiene materials, carefully stored and organised. The family rarely went out, and the children were home-schooled.

    The two women had a deep-seated suspicion of government and local authorities, investigators say, and had brought up the children to believe that the world was a hostile place.

    The Covid-19 pandemic, and Russia's invasion of Ukraine, had only served to strengthen their conviction.

    Searches of the apartment and of electronic devices revealed the collective suicide had been carefully planned, and even rehearsed.


    The adults were apparently waiting, the police report says, for the right moment to depart for what they believed would be a better world, away from the one they feared.

    Tragically, what appears to have triggered their decision was a welfare visit from Montreux police.

    They stopped by that morning to remind the father to go to a meeting with local education authorities to discuss the home-schooling of his son, after he had not answered several letters.

    They did not let the police in, and were dead minutes later.

    On Tuesday, the Swiss authorities appealed for privacy for the surviving son.
     
    #95
  16. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    please log in to view this image
     
    #96
  17. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    The Wild Conspiracy Theory That the Titanic Never Sank
    Believers say one gigantic boat was swapped for another for insurance money. Here’s the truth.

    please log in to view this image
    BY DAVID GROSSMANPUBLISHED: MAR 11, 2023
    SAVE ARTICLE
    please log in to view this image

    Bettmann//Getty Images
    When the Titanic sank in 1912, it shocked the world. The limits of human innovation were cruelly displayed with the destruction of such a technically remarkable ship. But a conspiracy theory that has crept up online in recent years, most recently on Reddit, begs the question: was it actually the Titanic that sank?

    We know. It sounds bonkers. But bear with us.

    Everyone seems to agree on one fact: a ship really did sink in the icy waters of the North Atlantic on April 15, 1912, and approximately 1,500 passengers aboard that ship died. The conspiracy theory simply suggests the Titanic wasn’t actually the technical marvel the ship’s parent company, the White Star Line, had promised.

    MORE FROM POPULAR MECHANICS
    The Truth Behind Aliens and UFOs


    Previous VideoPauseNext Video
    Unmute
    Current Time 0:05
    Loaded: 5.41%


    Remaining Time -13:16
    Captions
    Play in full-screen


    WATCH: The Truth Behind Aliens and UFOs

    please log in to view this image
    Why You Believe In Conspiracy Theories

    Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
    Rather, the White Star Line swapped ships for the voyage from Southampton to New York, and the ship billed as the top-of-the-line Titanic was actually an older ship: the Olympic. What’s more, the conspiracy theory suggests, the entire crash was an insurance scam gone wrong.

    J.P. Morgan and the Heyday of Big Ships
    The British White Star Line had stiff competition in England and across the globe. Locally, it had a fierce rivalry with the Cunard Steamship Company, Ltd., which in 1906–07 had sent on its maiden voyage the world’s then-largest passenger ships, the Lusitania and the Mauretania.

    To compete with the Lusitania and its mate, White Star Line entered into a giant ship war. The company was no stranger to such battles, but Cunard’s Lusitania and Mauretania had outgunned White Star’s so-called “Big Four” ships in terms of top speed. This time around, the company had some extra backing.

    In 1902, White Star had become a property owned by the International Mercantile Marine Co. (IMM), a holding company bankrolled by famed financier J.P. Morgan. With Morgan’s permission, White Star chairman J. Bruce Ismay began work on what came to be known as Olympic-class ships. If they couldn’t match the Lusitania’s speed, Olympic-class ships would outclass Cunard ships: they’d be even bigger, and more luxurious. Three ships were commissioned: the Olympic, the Titanic, and the Britannic.

    please log in to view this image

    The Titanic’s powerful owner, banking magnate J.P. Morgan (far right), is at the heart of many conspiracy theories.
    Historica Graphica Collection/Heritage Images/Getty Images//Getty Images
    The Olympic was the first to be built, and as the line’s namesake, it was considered the lead ship. Its maiden trip was widely heralded, and its first few voyages were unqualified successes. But on just its fifth voyage, the vessel ran into serious trouble.

    On September 20, 1911, while passing a military vessel, the Hawke, the Olympic made an unexpected turn. Caught off guard, the two ships crashed. The Olympic was able to limp back to port, badly wounded. A trial would later hold the White Star Line responsible for the incident.

    The Conspiracy Begins
    please log in to view this image

    The tear in the hull of the Olympic after the Hawke incident.
    Kirk and Sons of Cowes/Heritage Images/Getty Images//Getty Images
    Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
    Everything above is generally agreed to be fact. The Olympic crash is where paths diverge.

    After the crash, conspiracy theorists claim, the Olympic was an economic disaster. The lawsuit meant repairs would not be covered by insurance, and it was drawing no money while sitting around the docks. So, the company made a switch: its newly built second ship would take on the name Olympic, while its damaged older ship would be re-purposed to be the Titanic.

    Eventually, the true Olympic (now secretly operating as the Titanic) would be scuttled in an accident from which the White Star Line could collect an insurance payment befitting a brand-new ship—all while the ship originally built as the Titanic would have lived on. The only thing that ruined the plan was an iceberg.

    Other conspiracy theorists claim a more nefarious reasoning for the sinking: J.P. Morgan was behind the switch, eager to use an inferior ship to drown his enemies onboard.

    please log in to view this image
    The 30 Coolest Shipwrecks in the World

    Advertisement - Continue Reading Below
    Proponents of either theory point toward a number of clues: the Titanic didn’t allow for a public examination before its voyage, out of fear it would be found out by experts as Olympic in disguise, theorists claim. And then there are portholes. A recent popular Reddit post examines pictures of the Titanic under construction and the Titanic on its first voyage, and finds the second picture suspiciously changed and close to the Olympic.

    There are a plethora of other details. For example, separate claims point toward the argument the Olympic lies at the bottom of the sea instead of the original Titanic.

    The Conspiracy Doesn’t Add Up
    please log in to view this image

    The Olympic and Titanic being built side-by-side.
    Library of Congress/Corbis/VCG via Getty Images//Getty Images
    Titanic researchers Steve Hall and Bruce Beveridge have published a book on the subject, Titanic or Olympic: Which Ship Sank? They’ve also helped to write other books of Titanic history, including Titanic: The Ship Magnificent. The two take the porthole argument straight on.

    “The Olympic,” they write, “like the Titanic, was fitted originally with the same 14-porthole arrangement on the port side of her forecastle, but two additional portholes were later fitted; they were there in March 1912.”

    This content is imported from poll. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.
    Historian Mark Chirnside has also devoted serious time to the question of why, exactly, the switch would be made. In 2005, he examined the insurance argument—that the ship would be intentionally sunk to claim the insurance benefits. Quoting Ismay, “the Titanic ‘cost $7,500,000’—and was insured ‘for $5,000,000, I understand.’” This is backed up by the IMM’s American Vice President, Philip A. S. Franklin, who confirmed that the insurance policy was $5 million.

    “Were there a conspiracy, one would expect that the insurance policy would have been changed to cover the entire value of the ship,” Chirnside writes. “As it was, White Star could only expect to recoup two-thirds of the ship’s value.”

    Closely examined, none of the Olympic/Titanic claims can hold up to the phenomenal effort that was needed for the switch: the two ships were not exactly identical. The Titanic had a “unique café and enlarged á la carte restaurant,” Chirnside writes, and was modified based on the company’s earlier experience with the Olympic.

    That’s not all. It “is simply impossible to pass off a one-year-old ship for a new one,”he says, pointing to a number of small differences between the two, including “additional steel plates that were fitted to the bedplates of Olympic’s engines,” added in 1911, and still there in further inspections in the 20s and 30s. When the Titanic was investigated by the British board of trade, no such plates were found.

    It’s not that the Titanic or owner J.P. Morgan were above suspicion—Morgan demonstrated phenomenal power over the U.S. during his lifetime, resolving the Banking Crisis of 1907 almost singlehandedly. (As it happened, the Titanic’s sinking would prove to make IMM the rare Morgan financial failure, going bankrupt two years later.)

    But in that incident, there was physical evidence that Morgan was altering the monetary system. No concrete evidence of the Titanic conspiracy stands up to the evidence presented by the historians.
     
    #97
    Steelmonkey likes this.
  18. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    aliens
    please log in to view this image
     
    #98
    KentGaz and Steelmonkey like this.
  19. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
  20. kiwiqpr

    kiwiqpr Barnsie Mod

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    110,105
    Likes Received:
    214,363
    Chemtrails? Contrails? Strange Skies

    Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    Sott.net
    Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:00 UTC

    please log in to view this image

    © NASA
    Contrails as seen from space: the fact that now the contrails persists for so long is in itself a sign that something is not going well, but it's NOT evidence they are "chemtrails."
    A few things that should be considered when talking about so-called "chemtrails":

    1) Obviously, there is some "spraying" that goes on and it's not for the benefit of humanity. I've heard a few stories from people about very low flying planes dispersing stuff that lands all over everything or makes people sick. And I do mean LOW flying.

    2) Spraying that actually affects a designated area beneath the sprayer (the plane in question) must be at a fairly low altitude otherwise what is sprayed will not come down on the area beneath the spraying. This is due to the fact that our atmosphere has a number of layers and each layer has its own temperature and wind speed and direction, and very often, things in one layer take a very long time and distance to mix or mingle with other layers, IF they mix at all. Usually, the wind speeds in the upper layers are such that anything deposited there might only penetrate to lower, weather, layers, after many thousands of miles of travel. It's a very nonlinear situation and highly, impossibly, unpredictable.

    3) So, if you are talking about chemical spraying that you can see above in the sky, that then falls on the area below it, you must be talking about low altitude spraying.

    4) Therefore, trails that are very high in the sky that have no hope of ever interacting with the ground below them cannot properly be called "chemtrails" except, perhaps, if a chemical is being sprayed that is supposed to affect the weather (and even that is done fairly low). Cloud seeding is done by dispersing elements such as dry ice crystals or silver iodide in the atmosphere with an airplane or even ground based stations. Seeding clouds is believed to promote condensation of water droplets, thus, rain.

    5) Cloud seeding is usually done TO clouds, it doesn't create them. Plus, it, too, must be done at a fairly low altitude in order for the effects to affect the area below the activity. Otherwise, the higher wind speeds in the upper layers will carry the silver iodide away, disperse it, and the desired effect will not be had. Here's a page about cloud seeding: http://www.sandylandwater.com/ops.htm

    6) Small private planes fly at 12,000 feet maximum. Passenger airliners fly from 25,000 to 45,000 feet. The Concorde super-sonic transport cruised at Mach 2 at 57,000 feet. Miltary fighters get up to 80,000 feet, some specialty planes such as The U2 spy plane and the SR-71 are thought to go as high as 120,000 feet. the x-15 has a ceiling of 354,000 feet.

    7) From Wikipedia:
    please log in to view this image


    A chart showing the atmospheric levels and types of clouds that forms at those levels. Click to enlarge
    Cirrus clouds generally refer to atmospheric clouds that are characterized by thin, wisp-like strands, often accompanied by tufts, leading to their common (non-standard) name of mare's tail.[1] Sometimes these clouds are so extensive that they are virtually indistinguishable from one another, forming a sheet of cirrus called cirrostratus. Sometimes convection at high altitudes produces another form of cirrus called cirrocumulus, a pattern of small cloud tufts which include droplets of freezed water. The term is also used for certain interstellar clouds composed of sub-micrometre sized dust grains.[2]

    Many cirrus clouds produce hair like filaments made of the heavier ice crystals that precipitate from them. These "fall streaks", a form of virga, often indicate the difference in the motion of air (wind shear) between the upper part of the cirrus cloud and the air below it. Sometimes the top of the cirrus cloud is moving rapidly above a slower layer of air, or the streak is falling into a faster moving lower layer. The directions of these winds can also vary.

    Cirrus clouds are formed when water vapor freezes into ice crystals at altitudes above 8000 meters (26,000 ft).[3] Due to the sparse moisture at a high altitude, they tend to be very thin.[1] At this altitude, aircraft leave condensation trails that can turn into cirrus clouds.[4] This happens when hot exhaust, mostly water, freezes, leaving a visible trail. Streaks may appear straight when wind shear is absent, giving the clouds the appearance of a comma (cirrus uncinus), or tangle, an indication of high-level turbulence. The falling ice crystals evaporate before reaching the ground.

    please log in to view this image

    © Wikimedia Commons
    A sky covered with cirrus clouds.
    Cirrus clouds cover up to 30% of the Earth and have a net heating effect. Cirrus clouds efficiently absorb outgoing infrared radiation (heat) beneath them (greenhouse effect), while only marginally reflecting incoming sunlight (albedo).[5]

    A high number of cirrus clouds may be a sign of an approaching frontal system or upper air disturbance. This usually signals a change in weather in the near future, usually becoming increasingly stormy.[6] Cirrus clouds can also be the remnants of a thunderstorm. A large shield of cirrus and cirrostratus typically accompany the high altitude outflow of hurricanes or typhoons. Cirrus clouds have also been observed developing after the persistent formation of contrails from an aircraft. Increase in air traffic is a possible cause of an increasing amount of cirrus clouds.[7]8) Now, what is wrong with the picture presented above?

    Answer: the altitude of cirrus clouds vs the altitude of many jetliners that criss-cross the skies with trails which are obviously much lower than the altitude designated for cirrus clouds.

    YET the trails left by these aircraft ACT like cirrus clouds used to act at much higher altitudes.

    Most logical (and scariest) conclusion: the cold layer of the upper atmosphere has gotten lower and probably thicker and therefore, more airplanes flying at lower altitudes are forming contrails in that icy air which used to be the much higher domain of cirrus clouds.

    Because, again, if you understand about the layers of the atmosphere, temperatures, winds, etc, then you will realize that what is happening is NOT spraying of the human population or even intentional weather manipulation, it is the EVIDENCE that our planetary atmosphere has changed dramatically in the past ten years or so. More like 20 because that was when I began noticing the changes in cloud formation.

    9) Also notice that the trails left by planes at much LOWER altitudes, generally dissipate quickly. What is bad news is that they leave ANY trail at all at those altitudes! (And knowing how layers that form cirrus clouds function from the above, you can pretty well understand that they are not spraying stuff on the ground below.) But certainly, there CAN be the natural formation of cirrus clouds by plane exhaust or fuel dumping AND low level spraying of "stuff" at the same time. I would suggest that such cases are "cover up" the same way the endless "gray alien abductions" are a cover-up for what aliens are REALLY doing on this planet.

    For example, this very stupid video that is claimed to be "cloud seeding":



    It is not. What it is is evidence that the atmosphere layer that the plane is flying through is very cold. Now, whether that is a problem or not depends on where and what time of year the video was made. In some cases, cold air that low would not be out of season, so to say.

    10) Do these activities have any effect on the weather?

    Undoubtedly they do. But that is not intentional. See above discussion of cirrus clouds where the net effect is HEATING of the atmosphere.

    What seems to be happening is that the area of weather phenomena - the troposphere - seems to have been compressed by an expanding (or dropping) stratosphere and the stratosphere itself seems to have changed it's characteristics. THIS is VERY concerning! These are signs and symptoms, along with many others that we have chronicled on SOTT, that something very unusual is going on in our cosmic neighborhood because weather changes are taking place on other planets, too. I can guarantee you that they aren't doing "chemtrails" on Mars or Jupiter or Saturn.

    11) If you study the work of James McCanney, you will come to the understanding that the 5 layers of the Earth's atmosphere are also layers of alternating electrical charge. THIS IS IMPORTANT. McCanney also discusses how these electric flows around and on the earth interact with the sun to create our weather/climate. Piers Corbyn is becoming famous for utilizing similar principles for far more accurate weather predictions than the mainstream climatologists are able to work up. The fact that Corbyn CAN predict the weather as accurately as he does argues against the "chemtrails" being a weather modification activity. His method is concerned with solar activity, not so-called "chemtrails".

    12) Regarding these layers of electromagnetism surrounding the Earth, in 1958 some things were done that may very well have a strong bearing on the conditions of our planet in the present day. I would like for you to think about this in respect of climate change, so-called "chem-trails" and HAARP."Between August and September of 1958, the US Navy exploded three fission type nuclear bombs 480 km above the South Atlantic Ocean, in the part of the lower Van Allen Belt closest to the earth's surface. In addition, two hydrogen bombs were detonated 160 km over Johnston Island in the Pacific. The military called this "the biggest scientific experiment ever undertaken." It was designed by the US Department of Defense and the US Atomic Energy Commission, under the code name Project Argus. The purpose appears to be to assess the impact of high altitude nuclear explosions on radio transmission and radar operations because of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP), and to increase understanding of the geomagnetic field and the behavior of the charged particles in it. This gigantic experiment created new (inner) magnetic radiation belts encompassing almost the whole earth, and injected sufficient electrons and other energetic particles into the ionosphere to cause world wide effects. The electrons traveled back and forth along magnetic force lines, causing an artificial "aurora" when striking the atmosphere near the North Pole. This was reported only much later, on August 13-20th of 1961 in Keesings Historisch Archief (K.H.A.). The report said that the US Military planned to create a "telecommunications shield in the ionosphere at 3,000 km height, by bringing into orbit 350,000 million copper needles, each 2-4 cm long [total weight 16 kg], forming a belt 10 km thick and 40 km wide, the needles spaced about 100 m apart." This was designed to replace the ionosphere "because telecommunications are impaired by magnetic storms and solar flares." The US planned to add to the number of copper needles if the experiment proved to be successful. This plan was strongly opposed by the International Union of Astronomers."Then:On July 9th, 1962, the US began a further series of experiments with the ionosphere. From their description: "one kiloton device, at a height of 60 km and one megaton and one multi-megaton, at several hundred kilometers height". (K.H.A., 29 June 1962).

    These tests seriously disturbed the lower Van Allen Belt, substantially altering its shape and intensity. "In this experiment the inner Van Allen Belt will be practically destroyed for a period of time; particles from the Belt will be transported to the atmosphere. It is anticipated that the earth's magnetic field will be disturbed over long distances for several hours, preventing radio communication. The explosion in the inner radiation belt will create an artificial dome of polar light that will be visible from Los Angeles". (K.H.A. 11 May 1962).

    This was the experiment which called forth the strong protest of the Queen's Astronomer, Sir Martin Ryle in the UK. On the 19th of July... NASA announced that as a consequence of the high altitude nuclear test of July 9th, a new radiation belt had been formed, stretching from a height of about 400 km to 1600 km; it can be seen as a temporary extension of the lower Van Allen Belt" (K.H.A. 5 August 1962).

    "... Starfish made a much wider belt [than Project Argus] that extends from low altitude out past L=3 [i.e. three earth radiuses or about 13,000 km above the surface of the earth]."Later in 1962, the USSR undertook similar planetary experiments, creating three new radiation belts between 7,000 and 13,000 km above the earth. According to the Encyclopedia, the electron fluxes in the lower Van Allen Belt have changed markedly since the 1962 high-altitude nuclear explosions by the US and USSR, never returning to their former state. According to American scientists, it could take many hundreds of years for the Van Allen Belts to destabilize at their normal levels."Keep in mind now that, while they are out there blowing up our atmosphere, they want to blame Global Warming on the masses of regular people!

    My backyard overlooks the Pyrenees, the crossroads for air traffic between Europe and Africa, South America and Spain, Northern Europe, England, Scandinavia, and Southern Europe and Africa. It's a very busy place. I sit at my desk beside a window that overlooks this sky and I look out this window many times per day and notice the sky in all humors. The following photographs I took from my backyard are of CONTRAILS made by high volume air traffic that, on some days, leaves lingering trails due to the conditions in the stratosphere. Those conditions can be correlated with conditions in the troposphere as well as the weather before, during and after the days when these trails form and linger so long. If I was a hysterical, brainwashed nutjob, I would think I was being poisoned. But I know what they are, I have observed them for hours and days on end and have a memory of similar phenomena on a much smaller scale - and much less frequent because the planetary conditions were different - when I was growing up. Believe me, they are CONTRAILS...

    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    Changes in the atmospheric conditions have led to skies more and more busy in recent times.
    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    ¡CONTRAIL not "chemtrail"!
    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    please log in to view this image

    © Laura Knight-Jadczyk
    During the 1980's, rocket launches globally numbered about 500 to 600 a year, peaking at 1500 in 1989. There were many more during the Gulf War. The Shuttle is the largest of the solid fuel rockets, with twin 45 meter boosters. All solid fuel rockets release large amounts of hydrochloric acid in their exhaust, each Shuttle flight injecting about 75 tons of ozone destroying chlorine into the stratosphere. Those launched since 1992 inject even more ozone-destroying chlorine, about 187 tons, into the stratosphere (which contains the ozone layer).

    I'm reading a paper about cometary impacts which has some information that bears on our topic and I think we can trust it since it is not being produced in a program to disinform relative to so-called chemtrails.

    The first thing of interest is the main historically known large body which impacted the Earth: the Tunguska object. What is important to us in relation to chemtrails is that this object exploded in the atmosphere in June 1908 and for many nights afterward the sky was unusually luminous over Europe and western Asia, allowing people to read newspapers at night.

    When scientists finally made it to the remote site in 1927, no visible fragments of the exploded body were found. Later field work uncovered peculiar black, shiny, metallic spheres in the soil of numerous small, shallow, oval craters - 50 to 200 meters diameter - similar to the craters of the Carolina Bays. These spheres were typical of extraterrestrial bodies having a composition very high in iridium, nickel, cobalt and other metals.

    please log in to view this image

    © Unknown
    Trees flatten outwards in a central location of remote Siberia above which the cometary fragment exploded on the upper atmosphere in 1908
    Now, here is where the connection comes in: An unusually high content of these same metals were later found in Antarctic ice cores, but in the layer relating to the year 1912.

    That is to say, it took four years for the stuff deposited in the stratosphere to precipitate onto Earth.

    From the Antarctic data, global fallout of 7 million tons was estimated for the Tunguska body which means that it's diameter would have been about 160 meters.

    The dust from such objects exploded in the stratosphere diffuses over the globe and it usually takes a period of about three to six months for this to happen. The time that it takes for anything in the stratosphere to get to the ground is about 3 years (or more) and that is "independent of the initial amount of dust {or whatever}." Also, there are so many atmospheric variables that it cannot be determined where the stuff will go.

    That is, materials injected into the stratosphere do NOT precipitate onto the ground under which it is "laid" (as in so-called chemtrails) except, perhaps, almost accidentally, and much, much later.

    Again, this has no bearing on spraying that takes place at much lower altitudes, as in the troposphere, but clearly, what is going on in the stratosphere is NOT "chemtrails."

    I think that I have presented more than sufficient food for thought on the topic of so-called "chemtrails" to suggest that, yes, there is something really wicked going on, but it ain't what you think. In fact, it's worse. YES, something is VERY wrong in our skies - but it is not chemtrails. The CONTRAILS themselves have changed and THAT is a huge warning about our atmosphere and our climate and the implications are a lot scarier than if some nutjobs in the Pentagon were just trying to poison us. Heck, we could survive that. Most of life on earth will NOT survive what these contrails portend!
     
    #100

Share This Page