British Politics spam thread

Big Jock and Smelltic Paedophile Club plc knew you ****ing simpleton ****

Now **** off and smell and **** 8 year old bhoys fart pipes as is your wont.

****ing paedo apologist.

 

What an unsurprisingly mealy mouthed cowardly answer.

If you have the backbone, elaborate on specifically how you would have seen that played out.

Or more likely, just post some more diversionary cobblers to show you daren't actually answer.

 

You approached me with your paedofile fantasies, you **** off

 

Logically if you are fine with Israels reaction then you'd be fine with Hamas original reaction, unless you are bias of course.

What should Israel do to have avoided 7 October 2023 would be to not murder, kidnap, rape and steal from Palestinians

What should they do in the wake of it depends on their aims

If its free the hostages then they should start by not killing the hostages and trade hostages

If its revenge on Hamas then they should kill Hamas and not 13,000 children

If its a land grab then they're doing that part already

 

You don't understand the difference between logical and rational, and then go on to confirm my prediction.

"Or more likely, just post some more diversionary cobblers to show you daren't actually answer."

 

Literally answered your question in detail

Do you disagree? What with?

 

Nope, you started with a strawman with what you incorrectly described as logic, and then just waffled vaguely about **** all.

Having failed to offer any meaningful answer when you were cornered like a rat, you're now trying the usual lefty trick of trying to ask rather than actually answer in a feeble attempt to redirect the conversation.

#astransparentandpredictableasfuck

 

No I gave a logical scenario

If you think a greater evil is justified in response to a lesser evil then you must believe that lesser evil was justified in response to a greater evil

I then explained what you asked me to

 

As I said, you don't know the meaning of the term 'logic' and you continue to offer cobblers instead of answers, because you simply have no credible answer to the question of what Israel should have done in response to the massacres, or any of the other questions you've been asked.

You've simply waffled and gish galloped.

I'll just take your evasion as confirmation that you haven't got a ****ing clue.

 

Maybe you just can't read

 

You haven't really thought that reply through at all have you.

You can clearly read, but you also clearly lack comprehension and critical thinking skills, as well as self awareness or the guts to actually engage in the conversation at hand.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/afric...i-gay-law-parliament-speaker-says-2023-05-29/

Overwhelmingly Christian Ugandas Government, not Terrorist Group

 

I answered your question in full and you're to scared to respond because once I brought logic into it you realised the only way to disagree was to admit you are strongly biased.

Thanks for playing

 

Ah right, so that makes it okay to cob homo's off the roof in Gaza then.

I don't think you even realise you're doing it.

 

Repeating it doesn't make it any less bollocks or inaccurate than it was in the first place, but you do right to leg it. You've shown yourself to be an absolute cretin.

 

The Smelltic paedophile apologists don't know what to **** these days

 

Probably not but nobody mentioned Gaza, they mentioned Isis

Meanwhile

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGe9votjU/

 

The cost of living is hitting them hard. Have you seen the price of a bag sweets?

 

**** off daft lad, you're done.